My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Species Recovery Objectives for Four Target Species in the Central and Lower Platte River
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Species Recovery Objectives for Four Target Species in the Central and Lower Platte River
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2013 12:42:46 PM
Creation date
1/30/2013 4:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/26/2002
Author
James M. Lutey, Subcontractor for URS Greiner Woodward Clyde
Title
Species Recovery Objectives for Four Target Species in the Central and Lower Platte River (Whooping Crane, Interior Least Tern, Piping Plover, Pallid Sturgeon)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Columbus is where major tributaries enter the Platte River and where the character <br />of the river changes significantly. <br />4. The numbers objective for piping plovers on the central Platte River should <br />be 126 piping plovers as a 10 -year running average, which is 45 percent of the <br />Recovery Plan goal for the entire Platte River. <br />5. The numbers objective for least terns on the central Platte River should be <br />300 least terns as a 10 -year running average, which is 40 percent of the Recovery <br />Plan goal for the entire Platte River. <br />6. The distribution objective for least terns and piping plovers on the central <br />Platte River should be that no fewer than 25 percent and no greater than 75 percent <br />of the birds occur above Kearney, Nebraska over a 10 year average. Nesting habitat <br />can occur at both sand pits and instream sites. <br />7. A specific distribution objective for least terns and piping plovers by bridge <br />segment is not being recommended, however to spread the birds out as much as <br />possible, a significant portion of nesting birds should occur both in the upstream and <br />downstream sections of the central Platte River. Kearney is chosen as the splitting <br />point to prevent too much of a skewed distribution. <br />8. The fledge rate objective for piping plovers on the central Platte River <br />should be 1.13 fledglings per pair for a 3 -year running average. However, managers <br />should consider reviewing new studies and data that may indicate a need to change <br />this objective. <br />9. The fledge rate objective for least terns on the central Platte River should be <br />0.70 fledglings per pair for a 3 -year running average <br />10. Both riverine habitats and sand pits should be managed for least tem and <br />piping plover production. Sand pits should not be considered as a "substitute" for <br />riverine habitat. <br />11. An investigation should be conducted and reported on the characteristics of <br />sand pit habitat, especially foraging habitats, used by nesting least terns and piping <br />plovers. <br />12. All breeding adults and fledged piping plover and least tern chicks, whether <br />they fledge from sand pits or riverine or shoreline habitats should count towards <br />species numbers and fledge rate objectives. <br />13. Managers on the Platte River should standardize reporting of fledge rates by <br />reporting least tern and piping plover chicks per pair rather than chicks per nest. <br />Also, managers should standardize how numbers of pairs and how numbers of young <br />fledged are determined. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.