My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the PRRIP
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the PRRIP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:46:57 PM
Creation date
1/30/2013 3:53:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Prepared for the Governance Committee and Land Committee of the Cooperative Agreement for Platte River Research (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
11/30/1999
Author
Marty Zeller, Conservation Partners and Mary Jane Graham
Title
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Land Entity White Paper <br />November 30, 1999 <br />b. Working with adjacent conservation landowners on <br />compatible goals and management approaches <br />C. Working with adjacent agricultural or other non - <br />conservation landowners so that habitat management takes into account <br />neighboring land use, and so neighbors know what to expect and have <br />input into decisions. <br />6. Be accountable to the Program signatories for using Program funds <br />for Program goals. This includes: <br />a. Being responsive to changes in Program policy resulting <br />from peer review and adaptive management. <br />b. Accounting for moneys received and spent. <br />C. Paying property taxes (or equivalent) on acquired land. <br />d. Managing and investing moneys received from Program <br />signatories and from agricultural or recreational leases or fees to fund <br />further acquisition, restoration, maintenance and other habitat <br />management activities. <br />7. If the Program fails, manage the dissolution of all or some of the <br />assets, as directed by the Land Entity or committee charter, as appropriate, or by <br />the Program signatories. <br />Two other potential Program functions have been identified in some discussions <br />that may or may not involve participation by the Land Entity or other entities <br />implementing the land component of the Program: (1) serving as the banking and <br />financial management entity of the Program, taking on the functions now served by the <br />Nebraska . ommunities Foundation for the Cooperative Agreement'; and (2) identifying <br />and seeking grants and matching funds and other opportunities to raise money for land <br />protection purposes which would benefit the Program. <br />' As has been found during the Cooperative Agreement, it is extremely useful to have arrangements with an <br />entity that can write checks and apply funds to specific subtasks rather than four governments entering into <br />separate contracts with each contractor or vendor. Many, but not all, Program contracts will be related to <br />the land component of the Program. In serving this function, an entity would need to conform to the <br />separate accounting requirements of the four governments to provide confirmation that funds were disbursed <br />for the purposes they were appropriated. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.