My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the PRRIP
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the PRRIP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:46:57 PM
Creation date
1/30/2013 3:53:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Prepared for the Governance Committee and Land Committee of the Cooperative Agreement for Platte River Research (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
11/30/1999
Author
Marty Zeller, Conservation Partners and Mary Jane Graham
Title
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
November 30, 1999 <br />Land Entity White Paper <br />tasks and involve decision - making at some level, whether day -to -day implementation <br />decisions (such as today is the day to mow a meadow) or broader decisions (such as <br />whether to close on a specific land protection transaction or how to restore a particular <br />tract of land as habitat). <br />All of the listed functions need to be assigned somewhere in the Program's <br />structure, but it is not likely that all would be assigned to a Land Entity. The selection of <br />a management structure for the land component will ultimately depend on how <br />responsibility for the listed functions is to be divided: what levels of decision - making or <br />discretion will be in the hands of the task- implementing Land Entity or entities, and what <br />decision - making will be handled by the Governance Committee or elsewhere in the <br />Program's governance structure. <br />The following land component functions must be assigned to the Governance <br />Committee, a Land Entity, or another entity: <br />I . Negotiate, acquire and hold interests in lands counting toward <br />Program habitat protection goals. This includes the future ability to sell some of <br />the interests acquired, if appropriate. <br />2. Restore or enhance habitat lands, and manage them to retain <br />habitat values into the future. Restoration and management involve both planning <br />and implementation tasks. They must: <br />a. Improve and maintain habitat values for the target species <br />in a manner such that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service continues to <br />consider the Program sufficient to avoid jeopardy to the species. <br />b. Consistent with the willing buyer / willing seller/ voluntary <br />participant philosophy of the Program, be a "good neighbor" to <br />surrounding lands. <br />3. Develop and use strategies to achieve land protection objectives. <br />Strategies would need to cost - effective, fair and flexible. <br />4. Coordinate actions with habitat lands protected by others but <br />which will count toward Program habitat goals. <br />5. Coordinate actions with all levels of government, stakeholders, <br />communities, non - profit groups and others. This includes: <br />a. If land is not owned in fee, working with landowners so <br />that they know what to expect, understand their responsibilities, and <br />provide assurance that retained rights are not compromised. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.