case only a proportionate share of the cost of this project would be attributable to the
<br />Program. Fifty (50) percent of the total capital costs and annual costs attributable to
<br />Program were estimated to range from approximately $2.45 million to $4.61 million
<br />$78,000 to $255,000, respectively. Sixty nine (69) percent of the total capital costs a
<br />annual costs range from approximately $3.39 million to $6.37 million and $108,000
<br />$352,000, respectively.
<br />Table III -1
<br />Re- regulating Reservoir Costs
<br />Potential costs associated with third party impacts have not been evaluated. The project
<br />costs presented above may be higher if there are third party impact costs.
<br />0 Third -Party Impact Considerations:
<br />Potential third party impacts include positive and negative effects on the following:
<br />1. Hydrologic conditions: Includes changes in streamflows, canal flows, and return
<br />flows both in terms of timing and quantity.
<br />2. Economic and fiscal conditions: Includes changes in income, employment, sales or
<br />expenditure patterns, tax revenues, related industries, and economic development.
<br />3. Environmental conditions: Includes changes in water quality and habitat areas.
<br />4. Social Conditions: Includes changes in recreational areas, visitations, and
<br />expenditures.
<br />There are potential negative economic and hydrologic third party impacts associated with
<br />this project due to changes in the quantity and timing of streamflows. If the reservoir is
<br />filled by re- timing water already diverted under an existing water right there will be no
<br />additional diversions from the Platte River. Diversions to storage will decrease return
<br />flows at the J -2 Return and reduce available flows for new downstream water users in the
<br />\ \DN00 \E- DRIVE\PROJECTS\Platte \Work Products \Task 9 \1apc report (Version 7).doc 14
<br />Jeffrey
<br />Smith
<br />Midway
<br />No. 2
<br />Midway
<br />No. 5
<br />N. Plum
<br />J -2
<br />CAPITAL COSTS
<br />Land Acquisition
<br />524,000
<br />715,000
<br />276,000
<br />421,000
<br />221,000
<br />206,000
<br />Access Roadway
<br />450,000
<br />2,075,055
<br />925,000
<br />1,567,580
<br />137,500
<br />2,088,517
<br />1,215,000
<br />1,856,685
<br />165,841
<br />1,893,841
<br />75,000
<br />4,301,481
<br />Pump Intake System
<br />Outlet Structure
<br />200,000
<br />200,000
<br />240,000
<br />240,000
<br />200,000
<br />240,000
<br />Spillway
<br />315,833
<br />4,662,515
<br />226,983
<br />4,756,115
<br />218,000
<br />3,1553000
<br />194,517
<br />3,361,574
<br />280,500
<br />2,033,944
<br />242,083
<br />1,892,599
<br />Earth Dam
<br />Outlet System
<br />1,001,775
<br />94,612
<br />157,254
<br />83,179
<br />111,308
<br />231,328
<br />Total Capital Cost
<br />9,229,178
<br />8,485,290
<br />4,242,645
<br />6,272,271
<br />3,136,136
<br />7,371,955
<br />3,685,978
<br />4,906,313
<br />2,453,157
<br />7,188,491
<br />3,594,246
<br />50% of the Capital Cost
<br />69% of the Capital Cost
<br />4,614,589
<br />6,368,133
<br />5,854,850
<br />4,327,867
<br />5,086,649
<br />3,385,356
<br />4,960,059
<br />ANNUAL COSTS
<br />Hydropower Lost
<br />63,796
<br />36,612
<br />20,648
<br />23,908
<br />28,288
<br />33,880
<br />209,002
<br />O &M and Power Costs
<br />315,946
<br />408,301
<br />444,913
<br />485,389
<br />506,037
<br />485,931
<br />509,839
<br />128,113
<br />156,401
<br />242,882
<br />Total Annual Cost
<br />50% of the Annual Cost
<br />379,742
<br />189,871
<br />222,457
<br />253,019
<br />254,920
<br />78,201
<br />121,441
<br />69% of the Capital Cost
<br />262,022
<br />306,990
<br />349,166
<br />351,789
<br />107,917
<br />167,589
<br />Potential costs associated with third party impacts have not been evaluated. The project
<br />costs presented above may be higher if there are third party impact costs.
<br />0 Third -Party Impact Considerations:
<br />Potential third party impacts include positive and negative effects on the following:
<br />1. Hydrologic conditions: Includes changes in streamflows, canal flows, and return
<br />flows both in terms of timing and quantity.
<br />2. Economic and fiscal conditions: Includes changes in income, employment, sales or
<br />expenditure patterns, tax revenues, related industries, and economic development.
<br />3. Environmental conditions: Includes changes in water quality and habitat areas.
<br />4. Social Conditions: Includes changes in recreational areas, visitations, and
<br />expenditures.
<br />There are potential negative economic and hydrologic third party impacts associated with
<br />this project due to changes in the quantity and timing of streamflows. If the reservoir is
<br />filled by re- timing water already diverted under an existing water right there will be no
<br />additional diversions from the Platte River. Diversions to storage will decrease return
<br />flows at the J -2 Return and reduce available flows for new downstream water users in the
<br />\ \DN00 \E- DRIVE\PROJECTS\Platte \Work Products \Task 9 \1apc report (Version 7).doc 14
<br />
|