My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Status of the Interior Least Tern and Piping Plover in Nebraska
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Status of the Interior Least Tern and Piping Plover in Nebraska
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2013 10:59:20 AM
Creation date
1/29/2013 1:20:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Prepared for Interstate Task Force on Endangered Species (related to the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP), Colorado Water Congress, Nebraska Water Resources Association, Wyoming Water Development Association Tom Pitts, P.E. Task Force Coordinator
State
CO
WY
NE
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/1/1988
Author
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
Title
Status of the Interior Least Tern and Piping Plover in Nebraska (Period of Record through 1986)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i F= <br />vulnerable habit of nesting on low river bars and other land surfaces exposed <br />to the rigors of the plains climate (rainstorms, wind storms, hail, floods, and <br />intense heat), low production is undoubtedly a regular occurrence. As reported <br />by McNicholl (1975), nesting in widely fluctuating habitats requires flexibil- <br />ity in selecting nest sites, but unstable or immediately stable habitat may not <br />prove successful every year. Hardy (1957) commented that sudden rises of water <br />sufficient to inundate tern colonies are particularly likely in streams <br />traversing the plains region, and in many colonies (especially those on low <br />bars) floods take a heavy toll. He further stated that the "extremely high <br />mortality" of young least terns up to the flying stage is compensated by low <br />mortality in adults. <br />For California least terns, Atwood and Massey (1981) indicated that a <br />production rate of 1.0 -1.5 fledglings /nesting pair is considered good success, <br />0.50 -1.0 /pair is moderate, and 0 -0.5 /pair is poor. For Atlantic Coast least <br />terns, on the other hand, Burger (1984) considered colonies producing more than <br />0.5 fledglings /nesting pair as successful, and those producing 0.25 -0.49 <br />fledglings /pair as moderately successful. Burger additionally reported that <br />reproductive success for least tern colonies in New Jersey averaged 0.48 <br />fledglings /nesting pair (range: 0.2 to 0.8 fledglings /pair) over the 5 -year <br />period 1978 -1982 during which time the number of breeding birds increased <br />significantly. Ultimately, however, determination of whether a given <br />production rate results in population increase or decrease is dependent on the <br />level of production necessary to maintain a stable or self- sustaining <br />population (where mortality in the breeding stock is balanced by production). <br />Because of more rapid population turnover, short -lived species require higher <br />production rates to maintain their populations. Consequently, the long life <br />span of the least tern (one banded bird lived to be 21 years old [Wingfield <br />1982]) is of definite survival importance. Based on a 10 -year breeding span <br />for adult least terns (Wingfield 1982), and assuming 33 percent mortality from <br />fledgling stage to reproductive maturity at age 2, the mean annual production <br />rate required to maintain a self - sustaining population would be 0.30 <br />fledglings /nesting pair. <br />Maintenance of a self- sustaining production rate of 0.30 fledglings /nesting <br />pair would, in effect, require that each pair of adult least terns in the <br />population produce three fledglings any time during their 10 -year breeding <br />span. Lower production one year could be offset by higher production the next, <br />or higher production at one nesting area could compensate for lower production <br />at another. Within this context, cumulative production rates above 0.30 <br />fledglings /nesting pair would affect population growth, whereas lower rates <br />would affect population decline. If subsequent information indicates the <br />average number of breeding years per adult is less than or greater than 10, or <br />that juvenile mortality is less than or greater than 33 percent, then a higher <br />or lower production rate would be necessary to achieve a self- sustaining <br />population. <br />Production data for piping plovers, which in Nebraska utilize the same types of <br />nesting habitat as least terns, also reflect considerable variability between <br />years and from one location to the next. Along the Platte River, production <br />rates reported at sandpit colonies in 1984 (1.80 fledglings /nesting pair) were <br />substantially higher than those reported at sandpit or river sandbar colonies <br />in 1986 (0.27 and 0.23 fledglings /nesting pair, respectively). Along the <br />Missouri River, approximately 0.24 piping plover young per nesting pair were <br />vi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.