Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />11.2 Projects with Significant Potential to Reduce Target Flow <br />Shortages (Between 5,000 and 10,000 ac -ft per year <br />without diversions) ................................ ...........................11 -4 <br />11.3 Projects Which Cost Less than $1,000 per ac -ft of Average <br />Production in Target Flow Shortages (without Diversions <br />Scenario) ............................................... ...........................11 -6 <br />Figures <br />1.1 Platte River Study Area .................... ............................... 1 -7 <br />1.2 Platte River Basin Study Reaches ... ............................... 1 -12 <br />3.1 Platte River Basin Study Reaches ..... ............................... 3 -2 <br />4.1 Water Use by Region for 1995 ......... ............................... 4 -3 <br />5.1 Analysis Process ............................... ............................... 5 -2 <br />7.1 Study Reach Representation in Water Budget Spreadsheet.. <br />7 -4 <br />7.2 <br />........................................................... ............................... <br />Diversions and Return Flows Represented in Water <br />Budget Spreadsheet ........................... ............................... 7 -5 <br />8.A.1 <br />Specific and/or Representative Projects Evaluated from <br />the Short List of Alternatives ........ ............................... 8 -A -2 <br />8.E.1 <br />Relocation of Return Flows in the Critical Habitat ..... 8 -E -3 <br />11.1 <br />Scoring for Reservoir Alternatives With Diversions..... 11 -8 <br />11.2 <br />Scoring for Reservoir Alternatives With No Diversions <br />inAny State ..................................... ............................... 11 -9 <br />11.3 <br />Scoring for Agricultural Conservation Projects With <br />Diversions..................................... ............................... 11 -10 <br />11.4 <br />Scoring for Agricultural Conservation Projects With <br />No Diversions in Any State .......... ............................... 11 -11 <br />11.5 <br />Scoring for Reuse Alternatives With No Diversions <br />inAny State ................................... ............................... 11 -12 <br />11.6 <br />Scoring for Incentive Based Agricultural Water Use <br />Projects With Diversions .............. ............................... 11 -13 <br />11.7 <br />Scoring for Land Purchase and Irrigation Retirement <br />Projects With No Diversions in Any State .................. 11 -14 <br />11.8 <br />Scoring for Purchase Agricultural Water Rights Projects <br />With No Diversions in Any State . ............................... 11 -15 <br />11.9 <br />Scoring for Land Fallowing Projects With No <br />Diversions in Any State ................ ............................... 11 -16 <br />11.10 <br />Scoring for Temporary Leasing of Agricultural Water Supplies <br />Projects With No Diversions in Any State .................. 11 -17 <br />11.11 <br />Scoring for Dry Year Leasing Projects With No <br />Diversions in Any State ................ ............................... 11 -18 <br />1APROJECTS \Platte \Work Products \Task 7 \TOC3.doc <br />XXIII <br />