My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Water Conservation / Supply Reconnaissance Study Part 1
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Water Conservation / Supply Reconnaissance Study Part 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2013 12:12:05 PM
Creation date
1/29/2013 11:22:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Part 1 of Final Report for the Platte River Research Cooperative Agreement (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
12/1/1999
Author
Boyle Engineering Corporation
Title
Water Conservation/Supply Reconnaissance Study for the Platte River Research Cooperative Agreement - Part 1
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
416
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />8.H.24 Scoring Table — No Diversions in Any state, Category 6 — <br />Systems Integration and Management .... .........................8 -H -53 <br />8.I.1 <br />USFS Management Area Prescription Categories ........... 8 -I -6 <br />8.I.2 <br />Forest Management Alternatives Incorporated in Water Yield <br />Alternative......................................... ............................... 8 -I -7 <br />8.I.3 <br />Summary of National Forest Incremental Water Yield ...8 -I -10 <br />8.I.4 <br />Distribution of Additional Water Yield .. .........................8 -I -12 <br />8.1.5 <br />Monthly Distribution of Increased Water Yield Attributed <br />to Forest Management Alternatives ........ .........................8 -I -13 <br />8.I.6 <br />Forest Management, Summary of Net Hydrologic Effects: <br />Regional Water Yield and Benchmark Scenarios ............ 8 -I -14 <br />8.1.7 <br />Forest Management: Regional Water Yield Scenario, <br />Reductions to Target Flow Shortages with Diversions .... 8 -I -15 <br />8.I.8 <br />Forest Management: Regional Water Yield Scenario, <br />Reductions to Target Flow Shortages without Diversions <br />................................................................. .........................8 -1 -16 <br />8.I.9 <br />Forest Management: Benchmark Scenario, Reductions to <br />Target Flow Shortages with Diversions .. .........................8 -I -18 <br />8.I.10 <br />Forest Management: Benchmark Scenario, Reductions to <br />Target Flow Shortages without Diversions ......................8 -1 -19 <br />8.I.11 <br />Distribution of Water Yield: Medicine Bow National <br />Forest Management ................................. .........................8 -1 -22 <br />8.I.12 <br />Forest Management, Summary of Net Hydrologic Effects: <br />Medicine Bow National Forest Management Alternative <br />................................................................. .........................8 -1 -24 <br />8.I.13 <br />Forest Management: Medicine Bow National Forest <br />Management Alternative, Reductions to Target Flow <br />Shortages with Diversions ...................... .........................8 -I -25 <br />8.I.14 <br />Forest Management: Medicine Bow National Forest <br />Management Alternative, Reductions to Target Flow <br />Shortages without Diversions ................. .........................8 -I -26 <br />8.I.15 <br />Alternatives Yield and Benefit by Reach, Category 7 — <br />Watershed Management .......................... .........................8 -I -28 <br />8.I.16 <br />Scoring Table — With Diversions in Wyoming, Colorado and <br />Nebraska; Category 7 — Watershed Management ............ 8 -I -30 <br />8.I.17 <br />Scoring Table — No Diversions in Any State, Category 7: <br />Management............................................ .........................8 -I -31 <br />11.1 <br />Projects with Greatest Potential to Reduce Target Flow <br />Shortages (More than 10,000 ac -ft per year without <br />diversions) ............................................. ...........................11 -3 <br />1APROJECTSTIatteMork Products\Task 71TOC3.doc XXII <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.