Laserfiche WebLink
low evaporation amounts. The evaporation computed <br />the lower South Platte River Basin in Colorado i for existing <br />gross flows. icall g recharge projects in <br />tYP y less than one percent of <br />BY selecting the correct location of recharge the river, the return #lows occumin basins with res <br />Depletion Factor g m the s pect to then distance from <br />a standardized <br />SDF ") method developed by theU. be optimized. The Stream <br />accretions to the n��used for analyzing the U.S. Geologic yey (uUSGS" <br />S SDF timing of well de ledons ) is <br />canal Teaches along GPs give SDF factors for recharge and recharge <br />of days and represent the lag Platte River in Colorado, basins and <br />P g time for rec These SDF factors have units <br />mathematical solution of the SDF harge to return to the river. From the <br />when 28 percent of the method, the SDF factor ' <br />amount recharged has m days represents the time <br />72 percent of the recharge returns to the river in the time to the river. The remain in <br />Period. Figure 1 is a USGS ma time followin g <br />River in Colorado. P of SDF factors for the lowest reach ESOP day <br />South Platte The SDF values for the South Platte <br />River Basin in Colorado range systems and recharge basins ' <br />wells will be located be tween the recharge bas 60 days to 1,500 in the lower <br />gradients days_ Observation <br />and return flows to the river from the SeCchha the river n , that <br />monitored. Estimates of re groundwater <br />Plan return flows to the river from � � seepage can be <br />may be reviewed by the Governance Committee d the operation of the T <br />Cooperative Agreement. during the to Tamarack <br />g rm of the <br />�• HISTORICAL ANALYSIS <br />Colorado has analyzed how the T <br />r 1943 -1994. For the Tamarack Plan would haVe o <br />flows for diversion Purpose of-.this historic anal Operated ding the period <br />Y the Tamarack Plan to recharge Ysifac iods and amounts of excess <br />assumed to occur when the following facilities in Colorado were <br />River Compact requirements were satisfied were satisfied: <br />Wildlife Service ( "RyyS i) flows exceeded (1) South Platte <br />Platte River in ") year round target fl ows at the the Fish and <br />anal Nebraska. Existing target flows for every Island gage °II the <br />analysis and the monthly target values varied hydrologic Ty monthiwere used <br />average, and dry with In this <br />Conditions of wet, <br />This analysis assumed that Ping of new <br />to recharge basins could occur d groundwater wells 1 <br />freezing Periods due to warmer unng the winter orated next to the river <br />groundwater tem mouse wells can o uring <br />Pumping to rechar a bas' peratures. Phis Aerate d <br />Colorado Division of wildlife st T fleets Potential o analysis also assumed <br />amarack Aerations at the 10,000 acre <br />to install appTOtely twen Ranch State wildlife <br />construct neceos tY new large capaci Wells ��' Colorado plans <br />of the new rec ary recharge basins and related an d associated pipelines and <br />barge basins which the wells pmonitonng features, The SDF values <br />P into will vary from 60 days to <br />3 <br />