Laserfiche WebLink
Biological Data <br />This segment of Willow Creek is a moderate gradient stream, with moderate to large substrate <br />size, punctuated by large boulders. The proposed reach is confined by a canyon, and some <br />portions of the creek are further confined by the construction and maintenance of a county road. <br />The riparian community is in good condition and composed of willow, alders, and cottonwood. <br />The creek supports a good diversity and biomass of aquatic macroinvertebrates, including <br />mayfly, caddisfly, and stonefly. The creek provides a good mix of pools, riffles, and runs for <br />fish habitat, and some of the deeper pools are critical for year -round survival of the fish <br />population. The fish population appears to change in response to hydrologic conditions. <br />Historical surveys have documented speckled dace in the creek system. Recent surveys have <br />documented white suckers. It is likely that the creek is repopulated from stocks in Blue Mesa <br />Reservoir after dry periods. <br />There are also numerous wildlife species that depend on the creek. There have been numerous <br />sightings of chorus frog and salamanders. In addition, bird inventories have documented <br />Audubon's warbler, yellow warbler, Wilson's warbler, green towhee, warbling vireo, broad - <br />tailed hummingbird, red- tailed hawk, common nighthawk, and brown -head cowbird. Finally, the <br />riparian habitat along the creek is considered critical brood - rearing habitat for the Gunnison sage <br />grouse, because the stream is close to leks (display areas) and nesting areas in adjacent uplands. <br />Field Survey Data <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water required to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method requires that stream <br />discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most <br />easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. <br />This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream <br />channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br />For this segment of stream, four data sets were collected with the results shown in Table 1 <br />below. Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based <br />on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. It is believed that recommendations that fall outside of the accuracy range of <br />-3- <br />