Laserfiche WebLink
parameters used in R2CROSS (average depth, percent wetted perimeter and average velocity) <br />were also used to calculate and predict the biologic instream flow recommendations. <br />For this segment of stream, several data sets were collected with the results shown in Table 1 <br />below. Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the measured discharge at the time of the <br />surveys (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows based on Manning's Equation (240% and <br />40% of Q), the method used, the summer flow recommendation based on meeting 3 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 hydraulic criteria. <br />Table 1: Data <br />Party <br />Q <br />Method <br />250 % -40% <br />Summer 313 <br />Winter 2/3 <br />BLM & CDOW <br />450, 325, 175, 100 <br />PHABSIM/ <br />RHABSIM <br />1125-40 <br />500 (bluehead) <br />325 ( flannelmouth)* <br />- -- <br />BLM & CDOW <br />450, 325, 175, 100 <br />Standard R2X <br />1125-40 <br />650 <br />115 <br />* The PHABSHWRHABSIM analysis was used to only quantify the suitable versus unsuitable <br />hydraulic habitat attributes of bluehead and flannel mouth sucker adults as a function of <br />discharge. Amounts shown reflect the discharge which produced the maximum amount of <br />useable habitat based on the measured mesohabitat types. <br />The CDOW and BLM evaluated all of the data collected to date and determined that best flow <br />recommendation would come from using the results from a combination of methods. PHABSIM <br />is a widely accepted method for quantifying the suitable versus unsuitable hydraulic habitat <br />attributes of selected species and life stages as a function of discharge. R2CROSS is best suited <br />for identifying flows with specific hydraulic criteria across riffle type habitats. The State of <br />Colorado has used 112CROSS extensively in the past to appropriate instream flow water rights. <br />CDOW and BLM were concerned that the standard R2CROSS method may not be appropriate <br />for this reach of the San Miguel River due to its major width (over 75' wide in most places), type <br />of fish species present (warm/cool water species) and its big river channel hydraulics and <br />characteristics. <br />Accordingly, BLM and CDOW staff compared results from their PHABSIM/RHABSIM data <br />analysis with their R2CROSS analysis. Using the results from the PHABSIM/RHABSIM data <br />analysis, the maximum amount of usable habitat for bluehead suckers was produced at a flow of <br />500 cfs, and for flannelmouth suckers at a flow of 325 cfs. The R2CROSS analysis indicated <br />that a spring/summer flow of approximately 650 cfs was necessary to meet all three of the <br />critical hydraulic criteria at this site and a fall /winter flow of 115 cfs would meet 2 of 3 of the <br />hydraulic criteria. <br />CDOW and BLM are recommending that a flow of 325 cfs, for the time period of April 15 <br />through June 14, is the minimum amount necessary to preserve the natural environment to a <br />reasonable degree, for this reach of the San Miguel River. This is based on the assumption that <br />325 cfs would preserve 90% of the weighted useable area available to the bluehead sucker and <br />100% of the weighted useable area available to the flannelmouth sucker. BLM and CDOW staff <br />also believes a flow that maintains adequate bluehead and flannelmouth sucker habitat should <br />also maintain adequate roundtail chub habitat. The spring/summer flow of 325 cfs was reduced <br />to 170 cfs for the June 15 through July 31 time period because of water availability concerns. <br />