My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Stream: San Miguel River Executive Summary
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Stream: San Miguel River Executive Summary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2012 2:16:12 PM
Creation date
9/5/2012 2:00:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Stream: San Miguel River Executive Summary
State
CO
Water Division
4
Title
Stream: San Miguel River Executive Summary
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
For this study, 7 one - dimensional cross - sections were linked to produce the series of rectangular <br />cells that formed the grid to estimate WUA. Mean depth and velocity conditions were calculated <br />for each cell at 4 different measured flows (100, 175, 325 and 450 cfs). Habitat suitability <br />criteria (HSC) were developed from the 2003 Riverine Fish Flow Investigation Study Report <br />(Federal Aid Project F- 289 -R6) written and performed by Richard Anderson, CDOW Aquatic <br />Researcher, and Gregory Stewart, Department of Geosciences Oregon State University. The <br />basis for this study was a 1999 request from the CWCB for the CDOW to provide biologically <br />justified instream flow recommendations for the Yampa and Colorado Rivers based on habitat <br />and flow requirements for non - endangered native fish. Anderson and Stewart used two — <br />dimensional (2D) modeling to develop habitat suitability criteria for bluehead and flannelmouth <br />suckers, two native species. Their methods and results are more fully described in Anderson and <br />Stewart (2003) and Stewart and Anderson (2005) and (2006). <br />The bluehead and flannelmouth sucker habitat suitability criteria were used to develop specific <br />hydraulic criteria that were incorporated into a PHABSIM/RHABSIM analysis. Stewart and <br />Anderson determined that "Abundance of bluehead sucker was a reliable indicator for instream <br />flows and habitat maintenance for the native fish assemblage. In the Colorado, Gunnison and <br />Yampa Rivers bluehead sucker habitat peaked at flows of 600 to 1,200 cfs. This flow range also <br />resulted in high habitat diversity and high native fish biomass. Their assumption that flows that <br />maintained adequate bluehead sucker abundance (about 25% of fish over 15 cm) would also <br />maintain adequate flannelmouth sucker and roundtail chub habitat was validated by this study." <br />CDOW and BLM determined for this flow recommendation that the bluehead sucker would be <br />the primary indicator species for the biologically based instream flow recommendation with the <br />flannelmouth sucker being the secondary indicator species. The main reason for this is bluehead <br />sucker abundance is directly related to availability and quality of riffle habitats. The primary <br />objective of most cross section methodologies, including R2CROSS, is to maintain quality <br />riffles. Riffles are the most vulnerable habitat to dewatering and are important for invertebrate <br />productivity. When riffle habitats are maintained, there should be sufficient habitats for <br />perpetuating carrying capacity (biomass) and composition for all members of the native fish <br />assemblage (Nehring 1979). To verify the flow recommendations, CDOW and BLM compared <br />results from their PHABSIM/RHABSIM study with results using the R2CROSS Methodology <br />with standard criteria. <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br />DOW and BLM staff, using a combination of PHABSIM/RHABSIM and R2CROSS <br />methodologies, developed the proposed instream flow recommendations for the San Miguel <br />River. Board staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />the output from the PHABSIM/RHABSIM and R2CROSS Methodologies to develop the initial <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. <br />These initial recommendations are designed to address the unique biologic requirements of each <br />stream without regard to water availability. In addition to the criteria developed using the <br />PHABSIM Methodology and RHABSIM Software, the three standard instream flow hydraulic <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.