Laserfiche WebLink
FRY -ARK PROJECT WATER <br />2000 Early Project Water <br />Allocation <br />In the 2000 early Project <br />Water allocation, the District <br />allocated 4,362 acre -feet of <br />Project Water to agricultural <br />users. Project Water allocated in <br />the early allocation must be used <br />by November 1, 2000. The <br />District through the Water <br />Activity Enterprise also sold <br />20,000 acre -feet of Enterprise <br />Project Water to agricultural <br />users. Enterprise Project Water <br />allocated in the early allocation <br />had to be used by June 1, 2000. <br />2000 Regular Project Water <br />Allocation <br />In the 2000 regular Project <br />Water allocation, the District <br />allocated 14,196 acre -feet of <br />Project Water to municipal and <br />domestic users, and 93,351 acre - <br />feet to agricultural users. <br />Agricultural users may choose <br />to pay for only that portion of <br />their Project Water allocation <br />they expect to use before July 15, <br />2000. Any remaining amount of <br />their allocation will be reserved <br />until July 15. They must notify <br />the District by July 15, of their <br />ALLOCATION <br />intent to use, and must pay for it by <br />July 15, any remaining portion of <br />their allocation they wish to use. If <br />the District is not notified of the <br />intent of the agricultural user to use <br />the remaining portion of their <br />allocation, or payment is not <br />received, then the remaining <br />allocation shall be available for <br />reallocation by the District. <br />Agricultural users have until <br />November 1, 2000 to use at least 80 <br />percent of their total allocation. At <br />that time any portion of their <br />allocation remaining in storage that <br />exceeds 20 percent of their total <br />allocation will revert to the District, <br />and will be subject to reallocation by <br />the District. The remaining portion <br />of their allocation, if any, must <br />be used by May 1, 2001. <br />Second 2000 Project Water <br />Allocation <br />reviewed by the District staff, <br />submitted to the Allocation <br />Committee for evaluation and <br />action by the Board of Directors of <br />the District at the regular meeting <br />of the Board July 20, 2000. <br />Applicants will then be notified of <br />the decision of the Board of <br />Directors concerning their request. <br />If you have any questions <br />concerning the second allocation, <br />or if you need further information, <br />don't hesitate to contact the District <br />Office. <br />Written by: Tom Simpson, SECWCD, <br />Water Resources Manager <br />Project Water Allocations <br />Municipal 14,196 acre -feet <br />Agricultural 97,713 acre -feet <br />Based on current estimates it Enterprise Project Water Sales <br />appears that additional Project Agricultural 21,718 acre -feet <br />Water will be available in 2000. Enterprise Return Flow Sales <br />Entities interested in receiving a <br />second allocation of Project Augmentation Plans 15,855 acre -feet <br />Water must submit a written Current total allocations and sales of Project <br />request to the District office by Water and Project Water Return Flows are <br />July 17, 2000. reflected in the above table. <br />The requests will be <br />Spring Runoff 2000 - Where was the peak? <br />Peak runoff in the high country <br />occurred about two weeks earlier <br />than usual this year. At Leadville, <br />Colorado, the Arkansas River <br />peaked at 725 ft 3/s on May 30; at <br />Parkdale, just upstream from the <br />Royal Gorge, the Arkansas River <br />peaked at 3,280 ft 3/s on May 30 <br />and June 1. Runoff in the upper <br />Arkansas River basin lasted almost <br />three weeks - from May 22 <br />through June 1. Overall, the peak <br />in the upper Arkansas River basin <br />was fairly typical of the peaks that <br />have occurred during the past ten <br />years; however, the duration of <br />the runoff was considerably <br />shorter. <br />Runoff in the Purgatoire River <br />and Fountain Creek basins was <br />much worse than in the upper <br />Arkansas River basin. Both the <br />streamflow peak and duration of <br />runoff in these basins were much <br />lower than what has typically <br />occurred during the past ten years. <br />This resulted from a below normal <br />snowpack and from increased <br />evaporation due to the high winds <br />that occurred in April and May. <br />Written by: Pat Edelmann, USGS <br />