Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 4 <br />Mulroy, executive director of the water authority. "It will save us some time. Five years is a good ballpark figure." <br />The proposal would also move an existing federal utility right of way from a large private tract in the southern part of the <br />county — on which a long -time friend of Reid wants to build a new town — and place it at the edge of the desert <br />wildlife refuge. <br />The legislation additionally attempts to override a court decision by ordering the Bureau of Land Management to <br />proceed with the sale of almost 13,500 acres on the county's southeastern border, near the town of Mesquite. The <br />auctions, authorized in an earlier bill, were blocked this year by a federal judge, who found that the environmental <br />impact of developing the acreage had not been documented adequately. <br />To Charles Wilkinson, it all smacks of the so- called Sagebrush Rebellion, the failed 1970s movement by Nevada and <br />other states to wrest control of public lands from the federal government. <br />"It's in a somewhat different guise but very recognizable," said Wilkinson, a University of Colorado Law School <br />professor and expert on public lands. <br />"What you have, instead of a recognition that federal public lands are there for all of us — are there to create open space <br />— you have flat -out sales of public lands," he said. "Second, you have a real cave -in to local interests, as opposed to <br />national interests. And third, you've got an emphasis on water development." <br />Reid says that he's no sagebrush rebel, but that his state, the home of the nation's nuclear test site and proposed nuclear <br />waste repository, deserves some relief from federal dominance. <br />"I opposed the Sagebrush Rebellion. I think what we're doing is very sensible and incremental and is being done with a <br />great deal of thought," he said. "And when it's all over, we'll have some beautiful wilderness areas." <br />Along with authorizing land auctions, the bills set aside federal land for wilderness protection. The Lincoln County <br />proposal would establish more than 750,000 acres of wilderness, including prized canyon lands and snow - peaked <br />mountain ranges that belie the state's stereotype as barren desert. <br />That approach — combining land sales and wilderness designations in one package — is catching attention elsewhere in <br />the West. <br />Inspired by the Nevada legislation, Rep. Michael K. Simpson (R- Idaho) is drafting a bill to create about 300,000 acres of <br />wilderness in the central part of his state while giving more than 1,000 acres of national forest — some of it in a <br />congressionally designated national recreation area and worth millions of dollars — to the local county to sell for <br />development. <br />Such linkages place conservationists in an awkward position. But some say they may be the only way to gain protections <br />for wilderness areas. <br />"Certainly our preference would be a pure wilderness bill," said Shaaron Netherton, executive director of Friends of <br />Nevada Wilderness. "I think in a state like Nevada that's a difficult thing." <br />Nobody expects the Lincoln County land to be snapped up at the sizzling pace or prices set by the Las Vegas auctions. <br />But, says County Commissioner Perkins, "I know from talking to developers there is a lot of interest." <br />He envisions second homes sprouting in Pioche and in the county's southern tier, where he lives — spillover <br />development from Las Vegas. <br />Perkins, who drives 90 miles one way to work hauling dirt at Las Vegas construction sites, points to the state map. "If <br />Vegas is moving north," he asks, "where are they are going first ?" <br />8/23/2004 <br />If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.com/archives. <br />• -_V1SR prinL <br />Article licensing and reprint o tions <br />