Laserfiche WebLink
The current Adequate Supply Program, <br />intended as a consumer protection <br />measure for home buyers outside AMAs, <br />was deemed ineffective and in need of <br />replacement by the far more stringent <br />100 -Year Assured Supply requirements <br />of AMAs. Currently, rural counties have <br />no authority to deny new developments <br />on the basis of inadequate water supplies; <br />however, granting such authority is the <br />goal of recently introduced legislation. <br />Nevada and Arizona Reach <br />Water Banking Agreement <br />The Southern Nevada Water Authority <br />and the Arizona Water Banking Authority <br />reached a historic agreement in December <br />that will guarantee 1.25 million acre -feet <br />of Colorado River water to Nevada in <br />exchange for $330 million to Arizona. <br />The deal also ensures Nevada's support <br />of Arizona's efforts to change existing <br />priority status rules, which give Arizona <br />junior rights status for Colorado River <br />water. Under current rules, if drought were <br />to severely limit Colorado River flows, <br />Arizona would be required to give up the <br />Colorado River water it uses in the Central <br />Arizona Project to supply water to Phoenix <br />and Tucson, before any other state would <br />have to cut its water use. Nevada has now <br />pledged in writing to support equal sharing <br />of shortages among states. <br />Under the agreement, Nevada will pay <br />$100 million in 2005 and $23 million a <br />year for ten years beginning in 2009 for <br />the river water, plus any additional costs. <br />The state will be allowed to withdraw <br />from Lake Mead an annual amount, <br />beginning with 20,000 acre -feet in 2007 <br />and increasing to 40,000 acre -feet per year <br />starting in 2010, until the full allocation is <br />withdrawn. Nevada would have until 2060 <br />to withdraw the total amount. <br />Arizona has been unable to use its full <br />annual allocation of 2.8 million acre - <br />feet of Colorado River water, and since <br />1996 has banked its unused allotment <br />in groundwater aquifers. According to <br />the Arizona Daily Sun, Herb Guenther, <br />director of the Arizona Department of <br />Water Resources, believes Arizona will <br />benefit from the agreement not only <br />because it will reduce costs of banking <br />unused water, but also because it will <br />ensure Arizona's share in future years. <br />Under current law, if California becomes <br />dependent on the excess water it receives, <br />Congress could opt to permanently reduce <br />Arizona's allocation. <br />Visit wwwawba.state.az.us, www.sitwa.com, <br />www.cap- az..com, and wwwazdailysun.com. <br />Nevada Acquires Land, <br />WaterAccess <br />Late last year, President Bush signed the <br />Lincoln County [Nevada] Conservation, <br />Recreation, and Development Act of 2004, <br />establishing both vast wilderness areas and <br />access for a proposed water pipeline, in <br />a compromise between environmentalists <br />and developers. Lincoln County is north <br />of Las Vegas, and is one of the least - <br />populated counties of the state, according <br />to an article in the Los Angeles Times. <br />Among the provisions of the bill, reported <br />the Times, are the sale of 90,000 acres <br />of public land for private development, <br />the establishment of 768,000 acres of <br />wilderness for 14 new wilderness areas, <br />and "rent -free rights of way across federal <br />land for a massive proposed pipeline <br />system that would carry groundwater from <br />rural Nevada to the Las Vegas area." <br />Nevada Rep. Jim Gibbons praised the <br />new opportunities it would provide <br />for economic development, recreation, <br />and tourism in Lincoln County, and a <br />representative of the Wilderness Society <br />noted that, while the bill isn't everything <br />they'd hoped for, the areas that will now <br />be protected are "extremely significant," <br />said the article. On the other hand, <br />criticism came from the Western Land <br />Exchange Project, which argued that <br />the bill will damage the landscape by <br />promoting privatization where there is <br />no demand and by permitting pipeline <br />construction, reported the Times. <br />According to the newspaper, the pipeline <br />easements will remove some obstacles <br />to Southern Nevada Water Authority's <br />interest in pumping groundwater from <br />Lincoln County for transport to Las Vegas, <br />but the agency will still have to comply <br />with federal environmental reviews and <br />state groundwater protection laws. The bill <br />includes $6 million from Las Vegas land <br />sales to fund a groundwater study. <br />Visit www.latimes.com. <br />Enviros Become Farmers in NM <br />The Las Cruces -based Southwest <br />Environment Center (SEC) has decided to <br />start farming to pursue the organization's <br />goal of restoring Rio Grande riparian <br />health, according to an Associated Press <br />story in the Albuquerque Journal. The <br />group wants to become a constituent of the <br />Elephant Butte Irrigation District (EBIW), <br />which requires its members to own more <br />than two acres of land and develop a crop. <br />The SEC hopes to buy a 15 -acre parcel <br />and 7 acre -feet per year of irrigation <br />district water rights from a private <br />landowner, and will consider cottonwoods <br />and wetlands —food for wildlife rather <br />than people —as their crop, said the article. <br />The SEC has a history of opposing farmers <br />over issues regarding management of <br />Rio Grande water and its natural habitat, <br />but unlike other groups who have sued <br />to accomplish the same goal, the SEC is <br />trying to work within the system, reported <br />AP. According to the article, the targeted <br />parcel already supports cottonwood and <br />willow trees, and the group may grow <br />organic agricultural crops as well. The <br />center is working to raise the $200,000 <br />purchase price of the land. <br />At a November meeting, the EBIW board <br />stopped short of publicly endorsing the <br />proposal by the SEC, according to AP, <br />but one board member did concede that <br />such actions are what the district has <br />"encouraged the environmental community <br />to do for years." <br />Visit wwwabgjournal.com. <br />March /April 2005 • Southwest Hydrology • 13 <br />