The current Adequate Supply Program,
<br />intended as a consumer protection
<br />measure for home buyers outside AMAs,
<br />was deemed ineffective and in need of
<br />replacement by the far more stringent
<br />100 -Year Assured Supply requirements
<br />of AMAs. Currently, rural counties have
<br />no authority to deny new developments
<br />on the basis of inadequate water supplies;
<br />however, granting such authority is the
<br />goal of recently introduced legislation.
<br />Nevada and Arizona Reach
<br />Water Banking Agreement
<br />The Southern Nevada Water Authority
<br />and the Arizona Water Banking Authority
<br />reached a historic agreement in December
<br />that will guarantee 1.25 million acre -feet
<br />of Colorado River water to Nevada in
<br />exchange for $330 million to Arizona.
<br />The deal also ensures Nevada's support
<br />of Arizona's efforts to change existing
<br />priority status rules, which give Arizona
<br />junior rights status for Colorado River
<br />water. Under current rules, if drought were
<br />to severely limit Colorado River flows,
<br />Arizona would be required to give up the
<br />Colorado River water it uses in the Central
<br />Arizona Project to supply water to Phoenix
<br />and Tucson, before any other state would
<br />have to cut its water use. Nevada has now
<br />pledged in writing to support equal sharing
<br />of shortages among states.
<br />Under the agreement, Nevada will pay
<br />$100 million in 2005 and $23 million a
<br />year for ten years beginning in 2009 for
<br />the river water, plus any additional costs.
<br />The state will be allowed to withdraw
<br />from Lake Mead an annual amount,
<br />beginning with 20,000 acre -feet in 2007
<br />and increasing to 40,000 acre -feet per year
<br />starting in 2010, until the full allocation is
<br />withdrawn. Nevada would have until 2060
<br />to withdraw the total amount.
<br />Arizona has been unable to use its full
<br />annual allocation of 2.8 million acre -
<br />feet of Colorado River water, and since
<br />1996 has banked its unused allotment
<br />in groundwater aquifers. According to
<br />the Arizona Daily Sun, Herb Guenther,
<br />director of the Arizona Department of
<br />Water Resources, believes Arizona will
<br />benefit from the agreement not only
<br />because it will reduce costs of banking
<br />unused water, but also because it will
<br />ensure Arizona's share in future years.
<br />Under current law, if California becomes
<br />dependent on the excess water it receives,
<br />Congress could opt to permanently reduce
<br />Arizona's allocation.
<br />Visit wwwawba.state.az.us, www.sitwa.com,
<br />www.cap- az..com, and wwwazdailysun.com.
<br />Nevada Acquires Land,
<br />WaterAccess
<br />Late last year, President Bush signed the
<br />Lincoln County [Nevada] Conservation,
<br />Recreation, and Development Act of 2004,
<br />establishing both vast wilderness areas and
<br />access for a proposed water pipeline, in
<br />a compromise between environmentalists
<br />and developers. Lincoln County is north
<br />of Las Vegas, and is one of the least -
<br />populated counties of the state, according
<br />to an article in the Los Angeles Times.
<br />Among the provisions of the bill, reported
<br />the Times, are the sale of 90,000 acres
<br />of public land for private development,
<br />the establishment of 768,000 acres of
<br />wilderness for 14 new wilderness areas,
<br />and "rent -free rights of way across federal
<br />land for a massive proposed pipeline
<br />system that would carry groundwater from
<br />rural Nevada to the Las Vegas area."
<br />Nevada Rep. Jim Gibbons praised the
<br />new opportunities it would provide
<br />for economic development, recreation,
<br />and tourism in Lincoln County, and a
<br />representative of the Wilderness Society
<br />noted that, while the bill isn't everything
<br />they'd hoped for, the areas that will now
<br />be protected are "extremely significant,"
<br />said the article. On the other hand,
<br />criticism came from the Western Land
<br />Exchange Project, which argued that
<br />the bill will damage the landscape by
<br />promoting privatization where there is
<br />no demand and by permitting pipeline
<br />construction, reported the Times.
<br />According to the newspaper, the pipeline
<br />easements will remove some obstacles
<br />to Southern Nevada Water Authority's
<br />interest in pumping groundwater from
<br />Lincoln County for transport to Las Vegas,
<br />but the agency will still have to comply
<br />with federal environmental reviews and
<br />state groundwater protection laws. The bill
<br />includes $6 million from Las Vegas land
<br />sales to fund a groundwater study.
<br />Visit www.latimes.com.
<br />Enviros Become Farmers in NM
<br />The Las Cruces -based Southwest
<br />Environment Center (SEC) has decided to
<br />start farming to pursue the organization's
<br />goal of restoring Rio Grande riparian
<br />health, according to an Associated Press
<br />story in the Albuquerque Journal. The
<br />group wants to become a constituent of the
<br />Elephant Butte Irrigation District (EBIW),
<br />which requires its members to own more
<br />than two acres of land and develop a crop.
<br />The SEC hopes to buy a 15 -acre parcel
<br />and 7 acre -feet per year of irrigation
<br />district water rights from a private
<br />landowner, and will consider cottonwoods
<br />and wetlands —food for wildlife rather
<br />than people —as their crop, said the article.
<br />The SEC has a history of opposing farmers
<br />over issues regarding management of
<br />Rio Grande water and its natural habitat,
<br />but unlike other groups who have sued
<br />to accomplish the same goal, the SEC is
<br />trying to work within the system, reported
<br />AP. According to the article, the targeted
<br />parcel already supports cottonwood and
<br />willow trees, and the group may grow
<br />organic agricultural crops as well. The
<br />center is working to raise the $200,000
<br />purchase price of the land.
<br />At a November meeting, the EBIW board
<br />stopped short of publicly endorsing the
<br />proposal by the SEC, according to AP,
<br />but one board member did concede that
<br />such actions are what the district has
<br />"encouraged the environmental community
<br />to do for years."
<br />Visit wwwabgjournal.com.
<br />March /April 2005 • Southwest Hydrology • 13
<br />
|