Laserfiche WebLink
GOVERNMENT <br />USDA Funds $19.5M for CO <br />River Basin Salinity Control <br />From the U.S. Department of Agriculture <br />In November, the U.S. Department of <br />Agriculture (USDA) announced that <br />Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming will <br />receive $19.5 million in funding from the <br />Environmental Quality Incentives Program <br />(EQIP) to control salinity in the Colorado <br />River Basin. The Natural Resources <br />Conservation Service (NRCS) will provide <br />$9.7 million each to Colorado and Utah <br />and $90,000 to Wyoming. Only these <br />three states have USDA - approved salinity <br />control projects in the basin. <br />Through EQIP, NRCS works with eligible <br />agricultural producers in the basin who <br />voluntarily implement land management <br />and irrigation improvement practices <br />that reduce salinity by preventing salts <br />from dissolving and mixing with river <br />flow. Improved irrigation systems <br />reduce leaching in the soil, which in turn <br />decreases the amount of salt that moves <br />through the soil into the water table. The <br />result is less salt in the Colorado River. <br />USDA partners with the U.S. Department <br />of Interior's Bureau of Reclamation and <br />Bureau of Land Management to carry <br />out Colorado River Basin salinity control <br />activities. The Colorado River Basin <br />Salinity Control Forum, established <br />in 1973 by the basin states, provides <br />interstate and interagency coordination <br />and guidance for the combined state and <br />federal salinity control efforts. <br />USDA aims to reduce the annual salt <br />loading by 705,000 tons by the year 2020. <br />So far, agricultural producers have reduced <br />over 404,000 tons of salt, nearly 57 <br />percent of the USDA goal. The collective <br />goal for the federal partners is to reduce <br />1.8 million tons of salt annually by the <br />year 2020. <br />Additional information on USDA's Colorado River <br />Basin salinity control activities is at wwwnres. <br />usda.gov /programs /salinity /index.himl. Additional <br />information on EQ1P is at www.nres.usda.gov/ <br />programs /egip. <br />12 • March /April 2005 • Southwest Hydrology <br />Updated Water Reuse <br />Guidelines from EPA <br />The U.S. Environmental Protection <br />Agency's Office of Water and Office of <br />Research and Development, in partnership <br />with the U.S. Agency for International <br />Development (USAID), have released <br />the 2004 "Guidelines for Water Reuse <br />Manual" (EPA625 -R- 04/018), which <br />provides water reuse guidelines and <br />supporting information to help water <br />and wastewater utilities and regulatory <br />agencies, particularly in the United States. <br />The new document updates the 1992 <br />guidelines by incorporating new <br />information on water reuse, including <br />expanded coverage of water reuse issues <br />and practices in other countries. It was <br />developed through an EPA Cooperative <br />Research and Development Agreement <br />with the consulting firm CDM, and <br />an Interagency Agreement with <br />USAID, along with extensive volunteer <br />contributions. Topics covered include <br />reuse applications, technical issues in <br />planning water reuse systems, U.S. <br />regulations and guidelines on water reuse, <br />legal and institutional issues, funding, <br />public involvement programs, and water <br />reuse outside the United States. <br />The 288 -page document is available through EPA's <br />Office of Research and Development/Technology <br />Transfer Program at wwwepa.gov /ORD/NRMRU <br />pubs 1625r041081625r04108.pdf. <br />Tribal Water Settlement Ends <br />Long- Standing Disputes <br />An agreement that the Arizona Republic <br />called "the most far - reaching Indian water <br />settlement in U.S. history" was signed <br />into law in December, settling decades -old <br />disputes involving the state of Arizona, <br />several tribes, and the federal government, <br />according to the newspaper. <br />The settlement allocates 47 percent of <br />the Colorado River water in the Central <br />Arizona Project (CAP) to Indian tribes in <br />Arizona, which may then lease the water <br />back to cities for a profit, said the report. <br />Cities are expected to benefit by having <br />a determined water supply and by being <br />able to claim a small amount of new water. <br />Specific allocations were made to the <br />Gila River Indian Community south of <br />Phoenix, which received the largest share <br />of CAP water — 155,700 acre -feet per year <br />— and the Tohono O'odham Nation south <br />of Tucson, which received 37,800 acre - <br />feet, according to the Republic. <br />Additionally, the article said the settlement <br />resolves a dispute over Arizona's <br />debt to the federal government for the <br />cost of building the 336 -mile CAP <br />canal, completed in 1993. The federal <br />government had previously demanded that <br />Arizona repay $2.3 billion of the canal's <br />$3.6 billion cost; the amount was reduced <br />to $1.65 billion in the agreement. <br />The bill includes $2.2 billion over 40 years <br />to cover operation and maintenance <br />charges for delivery of water to Indian <br />communities and to accommodate future <br />settlements. San Carlos Apache water <br />rights claims were protected under the <br />legislation, but are still under litigation. <br />The bill does not address Colorado River <br />claims by the Hopi and Navajo tribes, <br />which continue to await settlement, <br />according to the Republic. <br />Visit wwwazcentral .com/arizonarepublic. <br />Water Supply a Concern <br />for Rural Arizona <br />Rural Arizona needs state help in dealing <br />with water resource challenges such as <br />drought, rapid growth, and tougher arsenic <br />standards. That view was voiced at a <br />Water Conservation Leadership Forum in <br />Phoenix on Jan. 7. <br />One participant noted that establishing <br />new Active Management Areas (AMSs), <br />which provide water management in <br />Arizona's urban areas, is difficult, and <br />current AMA regulations would not <br />address some rural problems, such as <br />the tens of thousands of domestic wells <br />currently exempt from AMA regulations. <br />