GOVERNMENT
<br />USDA Funds $19.5M for CO
<br />River Basin Salinity Control
<br />From the U.S. Department of Agriculture
<br />In November, the U.S. Department of
<br />Agriculture (USDA) announced that
<br />Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming will
<br />receive $19.5 million in funding from the
<br />Environmental Quality Incentives Program
<br />(EQIP) to control salinity in the Colorado
<br />River Basin. The Natural Resources
<br />Conservation Service (NRCS) will provide
<br />$9.7 million each to Colorado and Utah
<br />and $90,000 to Wyoming. Only these
<br />three states have USDA - approved salinity
<br />control projects in the basin.
<br />Through EQIP, NRCS works with eligible
<br />agricultural producers in the basin who
<br />voluntarily implement land management
<br />and irrigation improvement practices
<br />that reduce salinity by preventing salts
<br />from dissolving and mixing with river
<br />flow. Improved irrigation systems
<br />reduce leaching in the soil, which in turn
<br />decreases the amount of salt that moves
<br />through the soil into the water table. The
<br />result is less salt in the Colorado River.
<br />USDA partners with the U.S. Department
<br />of Interior's Bureau of Reclamation and
<br />Bureau of Land Management to carry
<br />out Colorado River Basin salinity control
<br />activities. The Colorado River Basin
<br />Salinity Control Forum, established
<br />in 1973 by the basin states, provides
<br />interstate and interagency coordination
<br />and guidance for the combined state and
<br />federal salinity control efforts.
<br />USDA aims to reduce the annual salt
<br />loading by 705,000 tons by the year 2020.
<br />So far, agricultural producers have reduced
<br />over 404,000 tons of salt, nearly 57
<br />percent of the USDA goal. The collective
<br />goal for the federal partners is to reduce
<br />1.8 million tons of salt annually by the
<br />year 2020.
<br />Additional information on USDA's Colorado River
<br />Basin salinity control activities is at wwwnres.
<br />usda.gov /programs /salinity /index.himl. Additional
<br />information on EQ1P is at www.nres.usda.gov/
<br />programs /egip.
<br />12 • March /April 2005 • Southwest Hydrology
<br />Updated Water Reuse
<br />Guidelines from EPA
<br />The U.S. Environmental Protection
<br />Agency's Office of Water and Office of
<br />Research and Development, in partnership
<br />with the U.S. Agency for International
<br />Development (USAID), have released
<br />the 2004 "Guidelines for Water Reuse
<br />Manual" (EPA625 -R- 04/018), which
<br />provides water reuse guidelines and
<br />supporting information to help water
<br />and wastewater utilities and regulatory
<br />agencies, particularly in the United States.
<br />The new document updates the 1992
<br />guidelines by incorporating new
<br />information on water reuse, including
<br />expanded coverage of water reuse issues
<br />and practices in other countries. It was
<br />developed through an EPA Cooperative
<br />Research and Development Agreement
<br />with the consulting firm CDM, and
<br />an Interagency Agreement with
<br />USAID, along with extensive volunteer
<br />contributions. Topics covered include
<br />reuse applications, technical issues in
<br />planning water reuse systems, U.S.
<br />regulations and guidelines on water reuse,
<br />legal and institutional issues, funding,
<br />public involvement programs, and water
<br />reuse outside the United States.
<br />The 288 -page document is available through EPA's
<br />Office of Research and Development/Technology
<br />Transfer Program at wwwepa.gov /ORD/NRMRU
<br />pubs 1625r041081625r04108.pdf.
<br />Tribal Water Settlement Ends
<br />Long- Standing Disputes
<br />An agreement that the Arizona Republic
<br />called "the most far - reaching Indian water
<br />settlement in U.S. history" was signed
<br />into law in December, settling decades -old
<br />disputes involving the state of Arizona,
<br />several tribes, and the federal government,
<br />according to the newspaper.
<br />The settlement allocates 47 percent of
<br />the Colorado River water in the Central
<br />Arizona Project (CAP) to Indian tribes in
<br />Arizona, which may then lease the water
<br />back to cities for a profit, said the report.
<br />Cities are expected to benefit by having
<br />a determined water supply and by being
<br />able to claim a small amount of new water.
<br />Specific allocations were made to the
<br />Gila River Indian Community south of
<br />Phoenix, which received the largest share
<br />of CAP water — 155,700 acre -feet per year
<br />— and the Tohono O'odham Nation south
<br />of Tucson, which received 37,800 acre -
<br />feet, according to the Republic.
<br />Additionally, the article said the settlement
<br />resolves a dispute over Arizona's
<br />debt to the federal government for the
<br />cost of building the 336 -mile CAP
<br />canal, completed in 1993. The federal
<br />government had previously demanded that
<br />Arizona repay $2.3 billion of the canal's
<br />$3.6 billion cost; the amount was reduced
<br />to $1.65 billion in the agreement.
<br />The bill includes $2.2 billion over 40 years
<br />to cover operation and maintenance
<br />charges for delivery of water to Indian
<br />communities and to accommodate future
<br />settlements. San Carlos Apache water
<br />rights claims were protected under the
<br />legislation, but are still under litigation.
<br />The bill does not address Colorado River
<br />claims by the Hopi and Navajo tribes,
<br />which continue to await settlement,
<br />according to the Republic.
<br />Visit wwwazcentral .com/arizonarepublic.
<br />Water Supply a Concern
<br />for Rural Arizona
<br />Rural Arizona needs state help in dealing
<br />with water resource challenges such as
<br />drought, rapid growth, and tougher arsenic
<br />standards. That view was voiced at a
<br />Water Conservation Leadership Forum in
<br />Phoenix on Jan. 7.
<br />One participant noted that establishing
<br />new Active Management Areas (AMSs),
<br />which provide water management in
<br />Arizona's urban areas, is difficult, and
<br />current AMA regulations would not
<br />address some rural problems, such as
<br />the tens of thousands of domestic wells
<br />currently exempt from AMA regulations.
<br />
|