200
<br />CD -a
<br />Cc oc-, 150
<br />U U
<br />W
<br />0 M
<br />a ca.
<br />co a 100
<br />a�
<br />CM
<br />cc
<br />50
<br />aC--)
<br />June 19
<br />June 9
<br />May 30
<br />May 21
<br />May 10
<br />April 30
<br />Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
<br />O
<br />O Op O Qp v O b)
<br />Q O
<br />Cj0 ©O0 �`AO 00 O "00
<br />O O
<br />O
<br />CIO 0 0 0 00 0 0 OO
<br />0 0 O O 0
<br />O
<br />1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
<br />Water Year (October - September)
<br />Figure 3. (a) Comparison of mean daily streamflows in the Clark Fork Yellowstone River, Wyoming,
<br />during the 1950s and 1990s, and (b) center -of- volume dates for each year from 1922 to 2003, with
<br />the red curve showing the 9 -year moving average and straight lines showing the trend before and
<br />after 1950.
<br />mean measured flows in the Clark Fork
<br />Yellowstone River, Wyoming, during the
<br />1950s with those during the 1990s (fig.
<br />3a). The overall river discharges in these
<br />two decades were quite similar, with
<br />average flow rates of 27.8 cubic meters
<br />per second in the 1950s and 27.9 in the
<br />1990s. In the 1990s, however, springtime
<br />flows were larger and late summer flows
<br />were smaller than in the 1950s. Thus,
<br />flow generally arrived earlier in the 1990s
<br />than in 1950s, with an average center -
<br />of- volume date that was about 4 days
<br />earlier in the 1990s than in the 1950s.
<br />The year -by -year history of center- of -vol-
<br />ume dates for the Clark Fork Yellowstone
<br />River is shown in figure 3b, illustrating
<br />the general trend towards earlier flows
<br />in the river before, and especially after
<br />about 1950.
<br />Geographic Extent
<br />The geographic extent of the trends
<br />toward earlier streamflow in snow -fed
<br />streams is shown in figure 4, with tim-
<br />ing measured by the dates on which the
<br />snowmelt runoff adds a large initial surge
<br />to the rivers (fig. 4a) across the western
<br />conterminous states and by the center -of-
<br />volume dates in rivers throughout western
<br />North America (fig. 4b). Both measures
<br />indicate that flows in many western
<br />streams arrive a week to almost 3 weeks
<br />earlier now than they did in the middle
<br />of the 20th century. The largest changes
<br />have been identified in the Pacific North-
<br />west, but the trends also are present in the
<br />Sierra Nevada of California, in the Rocky
<br />Mountains, and through parts of British
<br />Columbia and southern Alaska.
<br />The regional trend in streamflow tim-
<br />ing developed in the midst of large year -
<br />to -year and basin -to -basin variations in
<br />both streamflow amounts and timing. The
<br />variations arc due to contrasts in topog-
<br />raphies, precipitation patterns, and snow
<br />conditions among the river basins. Trends
<br />toward later streamflow were detected in
<br />a few western rivers. Despite the basin -
<br />to -basin and year -to -year differences,
<br />however, over 90 percent of the stations
<br />with statistically significant trends in
<br />figure 4 have trended toward earlier run-
<br />off, signaling the breadth and strength of
<br />the regional trend in western states. The
<br />average center -of- volume date for rivers
<br />across the western United States is about
<br />9 days earlier now than in the 1950s.
<br />Cause of Trends
<br />These trends in timing are most read-
<br />ily attributed to winter and spring warm-
<br />ing, as depicted in figure 2, but that inter-
<br />pretation is complicated by recent trends
<br />toward more (or less) precipitation in
<br />some areas and by a broad trend towards
<br />slightly later precipitation. The causes of
<br />these long -term climatic trends remain
<br />uncertain. The observed streamflow
<br />timing and winter - spring warming trends
<br />are consistent with current projections of
<br />how greenhouse effects may influence
<br />western climates and hydrology; thus
<br />streamflow timing and trends may be
<br />attributed, in part, to global warming. The
<br />climate of the North Pacific Ocean basin,
<br />however, underwent a seemingly natural
<br />change toward warmer conditions in the
<br />eastern Pacific and western Americas
<br />around 1977 (Mantua, and others, 1997).
<br />This multidecadal change was part of a
<br />long -term cycle of climate fluctuations
<br />in the region and to an uncertain extent,
<br />has contributed to long -term climatic and
<br />hydrologic changes in the western states
<br />during the past 50 years. Continued and
<br />even enhanced streamflow monitoring
<br />and analysis of western snow -fed rivers
<br />will be needed to determine the precise
<br />natural and human - induced causes,
<br />and the likely future, of these western
<br />streamflow- timing trends. If the trends
<br />have natural origins, then they may well
<br />reverse themselves, but if they are driven
<br />by man -made influences on the climate
<br />system, the streamflow timing may
<br />continue to change. If the trends continue
<br />their present course, then the "natural res-
<br />ervoirs" provided by western snowfields
<br />will become progressively less useful for
<br />water- resources management, flood risks
<br />may change in unpredictable ways, and
<br />many mountain landscapes will endure
<br />increasingly severe summer - drought
<br />conditions.
<br />I1
<br />a)
<br />Water Years
<br />f
<br />— 1950- 1959
<br />1999
<br />Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
<br />O
<br />O Op O Qp v O b)
<br />Q O
<br />Cj0 ©O0 �`AO 00 O "00
<br />O O
<br />O
<br />CIO 0 0 0 00 0 0 OO
<br />0 0 O O 0
<br />O
<br />1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
<br />Water Year (October - September)
<br />Figure 3. (a) Comparison of mean daily streamflows in the Clark Fork Yellowstone River, Wyoming,
<br />during the 1950s and 1990s, and (b) center -of- volume dates for each year from 1922 to 2003, with
<br />the red curve showing the 9 -year moving average and straight lines showing the trend before and
<br />after 1950.
<br />mean measured flows in the Clark Fork
<br />Yellowstone River, Wyoming, during the
<br />1950s with those during the 1990s (fig.
<br />3a). The overall river discharges in these
<br />two decades were quite similar, with
<br />average flow rates of 27.8 cubic meters
<br />per second in the 1950s and 27.9 in the
<br />1990s. In the 1990s, however, springtime
<br />flows were larger and late summer flows
<br />were smaller than in the 1950s. Thus,
<br />flow generally arrived earlier in the 1990s
<br />than in 1950s, with an average center -
<br />of- volume date that was about 4 days
<br />earlier in the 1990s than in the 1950s.
<br />The year -by -year history of center- of -vol-
<br />ume dates for the Clark Fork Yellowstone
<br />River is shown in figure 3b, illustrating
<br />the general trend towards earlier flows
<br />in the river before, and especially after
<br />about 1950.
<br />Geographic Extent
<br />The geographic extent of the trends
<br />toward earlier streamflow in snow -fed
<br />streams is shown in figure 4, with tim-
<br />ing measured by the dates on which the
<br />snowmelt runoff adds a large initial surge
<br />to the rivers (fig. 4a) across the western
<br />conterminous states and by the center -of-
<br />volume dates in rivers throughout western
<br />North America (fig. 4b). Both measures
<br />indicate that flows in many western
<br />streams arrive a week to almost 3 weeks
<br />earlier now than they did in the middle
<br />of the 20th century. The largest changes
<br />have been identified in the Pacific North-
<br />west, but the trends also are present in the
<br />Sierra Nevada of California, in the Rocky
<br />Mountains, and through parts of British
<br />Columbia and southern Alaska.
<br />The regional trend in streamflow tim-
<br />ing developed in the midst of large year -
<br />to -year and basin -to -basin variations in
<br />both streamflow amounts and timing. The
<br />variations arc due to contrasts in topog-
<br />raphies, precipitation patterns, and snow
<br />conditions among the river basins. Trends
<br />toward later streamflow were detected in
<br />a few western rivers. Despite the basin -
<br />to -basin and year -to -year differences,
<br />however, over 90 percent of the stations
<br />with statistically significant trends in
<br />figure 4 have trended toward earlier run-
<br />off, signaling the breadth and strength of
<br />the regional trend in western states. The
<br />average center -of- volume date for rivers
<br />across the western United States is about
<br />9 days earlier now than in the 1950s.
<br />Cause of Trends
<br />These trends in timing are most read-
<br />ily attributed to winter and spring warm-
<br />ing, as depicted in figure 2, but that inter-
<br />pretation is complicated by recent trends
<br />toward more (or less) precipitation in
<br />some areas and by a broad trend towards
<br />slightly later precipitation. The causes of
<br />these long -term climatic trends remain
<br />uncertain. The observed streamflow
<br />timing and winter - spring warming trends
<br />are consistent with current projections of
<br />how greenhouse effects may influence
<br />western climates and hydrology; thus
<br />streamflow timing and trends may be
<br />attributed, in part, to global warming. The
<br />climate of the North Pacific Ocean basin,
<br />however, underwent a seemingly natural
<br />change toward warmer conditions in the
<br />eastern Pacific and western Americas
<br />around 1977 (Mantua, and others, 1997).
<br />This multidecadal change was part of a
<br />long -term cycle of climate fluctuations
<br />in the region and to an uncertain extent,
<br />has contributed to long -term climatic and
<br />hydrologic changes in the western states
<br />during the past 50 years. Continued and
<br />even enhanced streamflow monitoring
<br />and analysis of western snow -fed rivers
<br />will be needed to determine the precise
<br />natural and human - induced causes,
<br />and the likely future, of these western
<br />streamflow- timing trends. If the trends
<br />have natural origins, then they may well
<br />reverse themselves, but if they are driven
<br />by man -made influences on the climate
<br />system, the streamflow timing may
<br />continue to change. If the trends continue
<br />their present course, then the "natural res-
<br />ervoirs" provided by western snowfields
<br />will become progressively less useful for
<br />water- resources management, flood risks
<br />may change in unpredictable ways, and
<br />many mountain landscapes will endure
<br />increasingly severe summer - drought
<br />conditions.
<br />
|