Laserfiche WebLink
200 <br />CD -a <br />Cc oc-, 150 <br />U U <br />W <br />0 M <br />a ca. <br />co a 100 <br />a� <br />CM <br />cc <br />50 <br />aC--) <br />June 19 <br />June 9 <br />May 30 <br />May 21 <br />May 10 <br />April 30 <br />Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep <br />O <br />O Op O Qp v O b) <br />Q O <br />Cj0 ©O0 �`AO 00 O "00 <br />O O <br />O <br />CIO 0 0 0 00 0 0 OO <br />0 0 O O 0 <br />O <br />1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 <br />Water Year (October - September) <br />Figure 3. (a) Comparison of mean daily streamflows in the Clark Fork Yellowstone River, Wyoming, <br />during the 1950s and 1990s, and (b) center -of- volume dates for each year from 1922 to 2003, with <br />the red curve showing the 9 -year moving average and straight lines showing the trend before and <br />after 1950. <br />mean measured flows in the Clark Fork <br />Yellowstone River, Wyoming, during the <br />1950s with those during the 1990s (fig. <br />3a). The overall river discharges in these <br />two decades were quite similar, with <br />average flow rates of 27.8 cubic meters <br />per second in the 1950s and 27.9 in the <br />1990s. In the 1990s, however, springtime <br />flows were larger and late summer flows <br />were smaller than in the 1950s. Thus, <br />flow generally arrived earlier in the 1990s <br />than in 1950s, with an average center - <br />of- volume date that was about 4 days <br />earlier in the 1990s than in the 1950s. <br />The year -by -year history of center- of -vol- <br />ume dates for the Clark Fork Yellowstone <br />River is shown in figure 3b, illustrating <br />the general trend towards earlier flows <br />in the river before, and especially after <br />about 1950. <br />Geographic Extent <br />The geographic extent of the trends <br />toward earlier streamflow in snow -fed <br />streams is shown in figure 4, with tim- <br />ing measured by the dates on which the <br />snowmelt runoff adds a large initial surge <br />to the rivers (fig. 4a) across the western <br />conterminous states and by the center -of- <br />volume dates in rivers throughout western <br />North America (fig. 4b). Both measures <br />indicate that flows in many western <br />streams arrive a week to almost 3 weeks <br />earlier now than they did in the middle <br />of the 20th century. The largest changes <br />have been identified in the Pacific North- <br />west, but the trends also are present in the <br />Sierra Nevada of California, in the Rocky <br />Mountains, and through parts of British <br />Columbia and southern Alaska. <br />The regional trend in streamflow tim- <br />ing developed in the midst of large year - <br />to -year and basin -to -basin variations in <br />both streamflow amounts and timing. The <br />variations arc due to contrasts in topog- <br />raphies, precipitation patterns, and snow <br />conditions among the river basins. Trends <br />toward later streamflow were detected in <br />a few western rivers. Despite the basin - <br />to -basin and year -to -year differences, <br />however, over 90 percent of the stations <br />with statistically significant trends in <br />figure 4 have trended toward earlier run- <br />off, signaling the breadth and strength of <br />the regional trend in western states. The <br />average center -of- volume date for rivers <br />across the western United States is about <br />9 days earlier now than in the 1950s. <br />Cause of Trends <br />These trends in timing are most read- <br />ily attributed to winter and spring warm- <br />ing, as depicted in figure 2, but that inter- <br />pretation is complicated by recent trends <br />toward more (or less) precipitation in <br />some areas and by a broad trend towards <br />slightly later precipitation. The causes of <br />these long -term climatic trends remain <br />uncertain. The observed streamflow <br />timing and winter - spring warming trends <br />are consistent with current projections of <br />how greenhouse effects may influence <br />western climates and hydrology; thus <br />streamflow timing and trends may be <br />attributed, in part, to global warming. The <br />climate of the North Pacific Ocean basin, <br />however, underwent a seemingly natural <br />change toward warmer conditions in the <br />eastern Pacific and western Americas <br />around 1977 (Mantua, and others, 1997). <br />This multidecadal change was part of a <br />long -term cycle of climate fluctuations <br />in the region and to an uncertain extent, <br />has contributed to long -term climatic and <br />hydrologic changes in the western states <br />during the past 50 years. Continued and <br />even enhanced streamflow monitoring <br />and analysis of western snow -fed rivers <br />will be needed to determine the precise <br />natural and human - induced causes, <br />and the likely future, of these western <br />streamflow- timing trends. If the trends <br />have natural origins, then they may well <br />reverse themselves, but if they are driven <br />by man -made influences on the climate <br />system, the streamflow timing may <br />continue to change. If the trends continue <br />their present course, then the "natural res- <br />ervoirs" provided by western snowfields <br />will become progressively less useful for <br />water- resources management, flood risks <br />may change in unpredictable ways, and <br />many mountain landscapes will endure <br />increasingly severe summer - drought <br />conditions. <br />I1 <br />a) <br />Water Years <br />f <br />— 1950- 1959 <br />1999 <br />Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep <br />O <br />O Op O Qp v O b) <br />Q O <br />Cj0 ©O0 �`AO 00 O "00 <br />O O <br />O <br />CIO 0 0 0 00 0 0 OO <br />0 0 O O 0 <br />O <br />1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 <br />Water Year (October - September) <br />Figure 3. (a) Comparison of mean daily streamflows in the Clark Fork Yellowstone River, Wyoming, <br />during the 1950s and 1990s, and (b) center -of- volume dates for each year from 1922 to 2003, with <br />the red curve showing the 9 -year moving average and straight lines showing the trend before and <br />after 1950. <br />mean measured flows in the Clark Fork <br />Yellowstone River, Wyoming, during the <br />1950s with those during the 1990s (fig. <br />3a). The overall river discharges in these <br />two decades were quite similar, with <br />average flow rates of 27.8 cubic meters <br />per second in the 1950s and 27.9 in the <br />1990s. In the 1990s, however, springtime <br />flows were larger and late summer flows <br />were smaller than in the 1950s. Thus, <br />flow generally arrived earlier in the 1990s <br />than in 1950s, with an average center - <br />of- volume date that was about 4 days <br />earlier in the 1990s than in the 1950s. <br />The year -by -year history of center- of -vol- <br />ume dates for the Clark Fork Yellowstone <br />River is shown in figure 3b, illustrating <br />the general trend towards earlier flows <br />in the river before, and especially after <br />about 1950. <br />Geographic Extent <br />The geographic extent of the trends <br />toward earlier streamflow in snow -fed <br />streams is shown in figure 4, with tim- <br />ing measured by the dates on which the <br />snowmelt runoff adds a large initial surge <br />to the rivers (fig. 4a) across the western <br />conterminous states and by the center -of- <br />volume dates in rivers throughout western <br />North America (fig. 4b). Both measures <br />indicate that flows in many western <br />streams arrive a week to almost 3 weeks <br />earlier now than they did in the middle <br />of the 20th century. The largest changes <br />have been identified in the Pacific North- <br />west, but the trends also are present in the <br />Sierra Nevada of California, in the Rocky <br />Mountains, and through parts of British <br />Columbia and southern Alaska. <br />The regional trend in streamflow tim- <br />ing developed in the midst of large year - <br />to -year and basin -to -basin variations in <br />both streamflow amounts and timing. The <br />variations arc due to contrasts in topog- <br />raphies, precipitation patterns, and snow <br />conditions among the river basins. Trends <br />toward later streamflow were detected in <br />a few western rivers. Despite the basin - <br />to -basin and year -to -year differences, <br />however, over 90 percent of the stations <br />with statistically significant trends in <br />figure 4 have trended toward earlier run- <br />off, signaling the breadth and strength of <br />the regional trend in western states. The <br />average center -of- volume date for rivers <br />across the western United States is about <br />9 days earlier now than in the 1950s. <br />Cause of Trends <br />These trends in timing are most read- <br />ily attributed to winter and spring warm- <br />ing, as depicted in figure 2, but that inter- <br />pretation is complicated by recent trends <br />toward more (or less) precipitation in <br />some areas and by a broad trend towards <br />slightly later precipitation. The causes of <br />these long -term climatic trends remain <br />uncertain. The observed streamflow <br />timing and winter - spring warming trends <br />are consistent with current projections of <br />how greenhouse effects may influence <br />western climates and hydrology; thus <br />streamflow timing and trends may be <br />attributed, in part, to global warming. The <br />climate of the North Pacific Ocean basin, <br />however, underwent a seemingly natural <br />change toward warmer conditions in the <br />eastern Pacific and western Americas <br />around 1977 (Mantua, and others, 1997). <br />This multidecadal change was part of a <br />long -term cycle of climate fluctuations <br />in the region and to an uncertain extent, <br />has contributed to long -term climatic and <br />hydrologic changes in the western states <br />during the past 50 years. Continued and <br />even enhanced streamflow monitoring <br />and analysis of western snow -fed rivers <br />will be needed to determine the precise <br />natural and human - induced causes, <br />and the likely future, of these western <br />streamflow- timing trends. If the trends <br />have natural origins, then they may well <br />reverse themselves, but if they are driven <br />by man -made influences on the climate <br />system, the streamflow timing may <br />continue to change. If the trends continue <br />their present course, then the "natural res- <br />ervoirs" provided by western snowfields <br />will become progressively less useful for <br />water- resources management, flood risks <br />may change in unpredictable ways, and <br />many mountain landscapes will endure <br />increasingly severe summer - drought <br />conditions. <br />