Laserfiche WebLink
July 15, 2005 The Water Report <br />GRAVELLY ; <br />FORD R i <br />FRIANT <br />DAM <br />GENERALLOCATION <br />Copyright© 2005 Envirotech Publications; Reproduction without permission strictly prohibited. 21 <br />Discovery will also be required to evaluate whether the historic fishery can actually be restored and, <br />Fish & Farms <br />if so, what must be done to accomplish that result. Any attempt to order a remedy to restore the historical <br />fishery faces nearly insurmountable obstacles. Unless these obstacles are overcome, any water spent in <br />Historic Fishery <br />the attempt to restore the historical fishery will be "wasted." Depriving irrigators of that water would <br />Restoration <br />also result in severe economic impacts. Thus, it is extremely unlikely that these obstacles can be <br />overcome in a manner that is "reasonable, prudent and feasible." The remainder of this article describes <br />the physical challenges that defendants contend will frustrate any effort to restore the historic fishery on <br />the San Joaquin River, as well as the economic impacts that could be expected to accompany such efforts. <br />Challenges to Restoration of the River <br />FRIANT DAM TO GRAVELLY FORD <br />For the first 38 miles below Friant Dam, the San Joaquin River supports a healthy fishery. Salmon <br />spawning, however, could potentially occur only in the upper portion of this reach of the river. Spawning <br />generally takes place from about September through December. For salmon to spawn successfully, there <br />Gravel Needs <br />must be sufficiently large areas of gravel, of certain sizes and depths in the spawning riffles to allow the <br />spawning salmon to dig out redds. Gravel in this reach is very limited due to prior gravel mining <br />operations and gravel movement along the river is restricted due to the presence of several dams. Even if <br />the dams did not restrict gravel movement, the amount of water required to transport gravel and scour the <br />riverbed would be approximately 20,000 cfs. Friant Dam's valves, however, can only release a maximum <br />of 16,400 cfs. Moreover, as explained below, the current maximum channel capacity is only 8,000 cfs. <br />The river must be at certain temperatures to support suitable habitat. For example, temperatures <br />Temperature <br />above 56° F. would result in mortality of incubating eggs and decreased hatching success. Maintaining <br />proper temperatures for salmon and steelhead may adversely impact other native fish species requiring <br />warmer temperatures. Moreover, there may not be sufficient capacity in Millerton Reservoir to produce <br />the volume of cold water required to reach the confluence of the San Joaquin and Merced Rivers. Even if <br />it did have sufficient capacity, the San Joaquin River is very flat, which tends to result in higher <br />temperatures. <br />GRAVELLY ; <br />FORD R i <br />FRIANT <br />DAM <br />GENERALLOCATION <br />Copyright© 2005 Envirotech Publications; Reproduction without permission strictly prohibited. 21 <br />