My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail April 1994
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail April 1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2012 3:20:34 PM
Creation date
8/8/2012 3:05:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail April 1994
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/1/1994
Title
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squafish, and Bonytail April 1994
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Nonflow Related Activities <br />Nonflow activity related changes from the "without fish" scenario are those that stem from <br />activities generated by oil and gas operations, mining operations (sand and gravel), <br />construction (recreation and /or private dwellings), and the stocking of nonnative fishes. <br />These are activities that might well impinge upon the recovery of the endangered fishes. <br />1. Oil, Gas, and Other Drilling Activities <br />Significant amounts of oil and gas have been developed in the Colorado River Basin. Little, <br />however, is known regarding the effects of critical habitat designation on this production. <br />The impacts to society of the additional cost of production resulting from listing or critical <br />habitat designation would be measured by a permanent loss of production. A marginal <br />production facility that is closed due to increased monitoring costs represents a loss of <br />production in the short term. Thus, the critical determination for well - related impacts <br />resulting from contaminants is what percentage of producing wells will be capped and what <br />percentage of the actual production will truly be lost to society. For purposes of this report, <br />given the lack of available information, oil and gas drilling activities were assumed to be <br />unaffected in the seven -State region. <br />2. Nonnative Fish Stocking and Fish Program <br />A questionnaire was designed to determine the effects of critical habitat designation on the <br />stocking and fishing programs in the seven - States area. Nonflow effects on these programs <br />were determined through the use of personal interviews with State game and fish personnel.' <br />3. Other Impacts <br />Other activities potentially impacted include sand and gravel operations, the construction <br />industry, and public recreation facilities. No data were available for the effects on sand and <br />3 There was a section of the survey that focused upon flow effects of the stocking program and these results <br />were incorporated into the recreation analysis. <br />I -25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.