My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail April 1994
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail April 1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2012 3:20:34 PM
Creation date
8/8/2012 3:05:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail April 1994
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/1/1994
Title
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squafish, and Bonytail April 1994
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Based upon the characteristics of the Basin and the nature of the regional economies, the <br />annualized value of $7.08 million (1991$) reported in I -E -4 represents the national efficiency <br />impacts of critical habitat. <br />Table I -E4. National Efficiency (CGE): Present and Annualized Values <br />Conclusion <br />The regional impacts depicted in I -6 -7 provide three conclusions. First, regional economic <br />and national efficiency impacts are clearly positive. Second, the State -level impacts are not <br />distributed evenly over the individual States in the Basin. Finally, the percent deviation from <br />the "without fish" scenario is small. <br />I <br />x <br />Annualized Value <br />Present Value <br />(1982 $ millions) <br />(1982 $ millions) <br />0% <br />3% 5% 10% <br />0 <br />0.03 0.05 <br />0.1 <br />Scenario Al Real Gross Regional Product <br />7.92 <br />7.08 7.29 7.69 <br />205.92 <br />141.58 113.85 <br />72.55 <br />Earnings <br />6.62 <br />5.92 6.09 6.43 <br />172.13 <br />118.35 95.17 <br />60.65 <br />Gov't Rev. <br />3.20 <br />2.86 2.94 3.11 <br />83.20 <br />57.21 46.00 <br />36.67 <br />Conclusion <br />The regional impacts depicted in I -6 -7 provide three conclusions. First, regional economic <br />and national efficiency impacts are clearly positive. Second, the State -level impacts are not <br />distributed evenly over the individual States in the Basin. Finally, the percent deviation from <br />the "without fish" scenario is small. <br />I <br />x <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.