My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail April 1994
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail April 1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2012 3:20:34 PM
Creation date
8/8/2012 3:05:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail April 1994
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/1/1994
Title
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squafish, and Bonytail April 1994
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
National Efficiency Impacts <br />A general equilibrium analysis, which is capable of capturing the interactions across the <br />various sectors that make up the economy, is used to evaluate national efficiency impacts. <br />The CGE model takes explicit account of the exchanges between the region and the <br />remainder of the country and world and so reports national economic effects. <br />Table I -E -3 reports the "without fish" results in terms of the levels of activity. Thus, under <br />Scenario Al, there would be a $7.92 million dollar (1991$) expansion in the national <br />economy projected on the basis of the 1982 levels of economic activity. Similarly, there <br />would be an increase in employment of 710 jobs and increases in earnings and government <br />revenues. <br />Table I -E -3. Colorado River Basin — National Economic Impacts: Levels and Differences <br />($1991 in Millions) (Employment in Jobs) <br />Without Fish vs <br />Without With Fish <br />Scenario Al <br />Variable <br />Fish Scenario Al <br />With Fish <br />Real Gross Regional <br />593645.38 593653.43 <br />7.92 <br />Product <br />Employment <br />15029220.00 1502930.00 <br />710.00 <br />Earnings <br />354200.23 354206.85 <br />6.62 <br />Gov't Revenue <br />203822.01 203825.21 <br />3.20 <br />Scenario Al: There exists sufficient underutilized capacity in the construction and capital equipment sectors (within the Basin or elsewhere <br />in the national economy) that all additions to thermal electric capacity are a net positive addition to the level of national economic <br />activity. The recreation resources within the Basin are unique and the loss of these recreatibn opportunities cannot be replaced <br />within the U.S. economy. <br />If it can be assumed that the adjustments to the national economy represented by the CGE <br />results are permanent, then the present value and annualized values reporting the national <br />economic impacts can be estimated for the study period. Table I -E -4 presents these <br />estimates. For output, the discounted present value (3 percent) is $141.58 million (1991$). <br />ix <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.