My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Case No. 3:07-cv-08164-DGC Grand Canyon Trust v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation December 7 2007
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Case No. 3:07-cv-08164-DGC Grand Canyon Trust v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation December 7 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2013 2:57:56 PM
Creation date
7/27/2012 3:35:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 3:07-cv-08164-DGC Grand Canyon Trust v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation December 7 2007
State
CO
Date
12/7/2007
Title
Case No. 3:07-cv-08164-DGC Grand Canyon Trust v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation December 7 2007
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 humpback chub in the Grand Canyon have been documented. <br />2 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br />(Violation of ESA Section 7(a)(2) -- Duty to Ensure Against Jeopardy Against the <br />3 Bureau of Reclamation) <br />4 49. Each and every allegation set forth in this complaint is incorporated herein <br />5 by reference. <br />6 50. The 1994 Biological Opinion concluded that operating Glen Canyon Dam <br />7 under a Modified Low Fluctuating Flow regime jeopardizes the continued survival of <br />8 the humpback chub. Operating Glen Canyon Dam under a Modified Low Fluctuating <br />9 Flow regime violates ESA section 7(a)(2) prohibition against jeopardizing a listed <br />10 species. <br />11 51. FWS offered a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative that, if performed, <br />12 would eliminate jeopardy to the chub from Glen Canyon Dam operations. RPA 1(A) <br />13 includes a requirement to operate Glen Canyon Dam under a Seasonally Adjusted <br />14 Steady Flow regime in low water years. <br />15 52. Accordingly, by failing to comply with the 1994 Biological Opinion and <br />16 operating Glen Canyon Dam under a Modified Low Fluctuating Flow regime, <br />17 Reclamation is violating its mandatory ESA section 7 duty to avoid jeopardy. 16 U.S.C. <br />18 § 1540(g)(1)(A). Reclamation's failure to ensure against jeopardy renders its <br />19 operations of Glen Canyon Dam arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, not in <br />20 accordance with law, and without observance of procedure required by law, within the <br />21 meaning of the APA. 5 U.S.C. § 706(2). <br />22 SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br />(Violation of ESA Section 7(a)(2) -- Duty to Ensure Against Adverse Modification <br />23 Against the Bureau of Reclamation) <br />24 53. Each and every allegation set forth in this complaint is incorporated herein <br />25 by reference. <br />26 54. The 1994 Biological Opinion concluded that operating Glen Canyon Dam <br />27 under a Modified Low Fluctuating Flow regime destroys and adversely modifies chub <br />28 critical habitat. Operating Glen Canyon Dam under a Modified Low Fluctuating Flow <br />Complaint 16 <br />Case 3:07 -cv- 08164 -DGC Document 1 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 16 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.