My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2012 3:42:50 PM
Creation date
7/27/2012 1:51:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
5/11/1978
Author
Newton, Patricia
Title
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
R <br />1 see Mr. Gibson has some notes. <br />2 MR. GIBSON: Well, I have the minutes here and <br />311 I concur with the Chairman. It would appear to be desirable"if <br />4 we could adopt some procedure whereby maybe tentative approval <br />5 of the minutes could be exercised subject to the Compact members <br />6 and the Chairman submitting to the Secretary any questions or <br />7 revisions, suggestions, to the minutes, to be further acted on <br />8 at the next session of Compact. <br />9 MR. COOLEY: I like what you have said and I <br />10 think this might be even better, an improvement on my suggestion <br />11 There was obviously no intent on Lane Hackett's <br />12 <br />part, <br />or anyone else, <br />that the <br />minutes not be <br />fully <br />felicitous <br />13 11 <br />but a <br />lot of difficult <br />matters <br />were touched on <br />there <br />and the <br />14 minutes in some places simply don't ring quite in harmony with <br />15 my recollection of that. Fortunately, my recollection is gett <br />16 dimmer each month. <br />171! Does anyone from Colorado want to speak to the <br />18 question of the minutes? <br />19 MR. IDLER: Well, I don't remember anything that <br />20 was too controversial, so I would suggest that we follow Mr. <br />21 Gibson's idea. <br />22 MR. COOLEY-. All right, fine. <br />23 The minutes have not, furthermore, been distribu <br />24 as well as they might have been. So with that being so, I <br />25 would entertain a motion from either -- Yes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.