My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2012 3:42:50 PM
Creation date
7/27/2012 1:51:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
5/11/1978
Author
Newton, Patricia
Title
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
50 <br />1 vote or action, but it seems to me there is a consensus. <br />2 Yes, Leo. <br />3 MR. POLLART: Mr. Cooley, I am Leo Pollart, <br />4 President of the Amity Mutual, and I believe it was sometime <br />5 in March when the Bureau and the Corps of Engineers asked for <br />6 a general meeting and presented the plans of operation, one <br />7 thing and another, and asked for comments at that meeting here <br />8 in Pueblo. <br />9 I have here copies of presentations given by <br />10 myself and Mr.. 11owland on behalf of the Buffalo and the Amity <br />11 that I- .would gladly give to the Commission if they care to look <br />12 at them as to what our recommendations that day we felt that <br />13 affected the river and, in essence, affects the Compact, and <br />14 I would be glad to leave these with you for study and comments <br />15 and would encourage the Compact Commission to, well, keep in <br />16 contact and persist at both the Corps and the Bureau to get the <br />17 Channels large enough to at least take care of downstream <br />18 priorities, the capacity at Avondale, that would satisfy all <br />19 priorities downstream, at least within the State of Colorado. <br />20 MR. COOLEY: if any reaches Kansas, that's all <br />21 right. <br />22 MR. POLLART: Wellt it's got to reach Colorado <br />23 before it gets to Kansas? I'll put it that way. <br />24 MR. COOLEY: Fine. <br />25 MR. POLLART: And I'm quite sire that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.