My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2012 3:42:50 PM
Creation date
7/27/2012 1:51:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
5/11/1978
Author
Newton, Patricia
Title
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
12 <br />1 <br />assist in water storage? <br />2 <br />MR.. SCHROEDER: Well, the Company could do what <br />3 <br />the ,Compact suggests that it might do in the future, namely, <br />4 <br />authorize the storage of 15,000 acre -feet as opposed to the <br />5 <br />presently - authorized limit of 10,000 acre -feet. But that's not <br />6 <br />going to help put water, really, into the reservoir. <br />7 <br />MR, HELTON: Another thing the Compact might <br />8 <br />consider before that time is consider approving that mechanism <br />9 <br />as a means for supplying water to permanent pool.. <br />10 <br />MR. SCHROEDER: I was."> going to suggest that, <br />11 <br />also, that the Compact could, if it had a copy of the contract" <br />12 <br />before, for example, it could read the contract and put its <br />13 <br />endorsement, so to speak, on the contract as it stands before <br />14 <br />the Compact. I don't even know if you have a copy of it, <br />1511 frankly. <br />16 <br />But <br />that, again, <br />is certainly <br />not going <br />to put <br />17 <br />wet water into the <br />reservoir any <br />sooner than <br />it would <br />otherwise <br />1811 get there. <br />i9 It would perhaps, in terms of -- let's use the <br />20 word, frankly? PR value -- it might lend some favorable <br />21 consideration to the contract, proposed contract, which might <br />22 detract from some of the criticism which the proposed contract <br />23 <br />has received in <br />the past. A <br />plus from the Commission, to para- <br />24 <br />phrase some of <br />the testimony <br />we heard recently over the last <br />25 <br />few days, might <br />balance out <br />over the negatives that some of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.