Laserfiche WebLink
to whether Colorado water. law allowed this in- channel recreational <br />use. <br />Now when the case first was filed, the legislature did adapt a new law <br />to the Colorado water law by passing an in- channel diversion <br />recreational statute that allows cities and public districts to make a <br />reasonable appropriation for boating and kayaking, but it's subject to <br />consultation with the Water Conservation Board. <br />Dan Drayer: Well, the state has not heard the last of this case because of the time <br />on the Supreme Court justices, there's more to be said here down the <br />road. <br />Justice Hobbs: Yes, and you know I just have to look about whether I can participate <br />fairly at the time such a case comes up. I do want to point out the <br />new statute provides guidelines. That statute wasn't in place for the <br />time period where the court that split 3 to 3 had to decide the first <br />cases that came through. <br />But the result of it was there were three to four filings for recreational <br />in- stream flow rights recognized as a result of that 3--3 tie because the <br />Water Courts has recognized those rights. Our process is the Water <br />Courts of the seven Water Divisions decide these cases first, then the <br />come to the Colorado Supreme Court. <br />[interview continues for an additional 2 minutes] <br />Colorado Public Radio -Colorado Matters Show <br />Host Dan Drayer - August 28, 2003 <br />Excerpt of Interview with <br />Colorado Supreme Court Justice Gregory Hobbs <br />Page 3 <br />