My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150243 feas study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
C150243 feas study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2015 11:57:12 AM
Creation date
7/26/2011 11:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150243
Contractor Name
Aurora, City of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Adams
Bill Number
SB 07-122
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Responsible Environmental Planning <br />In all plannulg and design activities for the PWP, Aurora Water and its environxnental <br />consultant have coordinated and planned extensively to ensure compliance with federal and <br />state laws such as the Endangered Species Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Clean Water Act, <br />National and State Historic Preservation Acts, and the regulations administered by the <br />United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Army Corps of <br />Engineers, and the State Historic Preservation Office. Potential critical habitats for Preble's <br />Meadow Jumping Mouse, raptors, prairie dogs, and burrowing owls have been mapped, <br />and the construction sequencing and activity constraints associated with these areas have <br />been identified. Potential Waters of the United States and Wetlands have been evaluated to <br />determine appropriate preservation requirements during construction. In addition, the <br />conveyance system alignment, including a 1000-foot buffer, has been evaluated for <br />paleontologic and other cultural resources of significance. Consultation with the State of <br />Colorado's Historic Preservation Officer has identified acceptable mitigation measures for <br />pipeline construction. The PWP has been strategically designed to avoid impacts to <br />environmental and natural resources, as exemplified by the use of trenchless crossings as <br />needed to avoid impacts to wetlands or Waters of the US. Because of these efforts to protect <br />the natural heritage and environxnent, no federal permits will be required for the PWP. <br />Alternatives Analysis for the Conveyance System <br />In 2004, Aurora Water and its team of professionals began identifying and evaluating <br />alternative alignments for the conveyance system which will deliver water from the North <br />Campus natural purification facilities to the South Campus. Three alternative preliminary <br />pipeline alignments were carried forward from the initial screening process led by MWH in <br />2004: <br />Transmission Alternative 1- E-470 Alignment <br />Transmission Alternative 2- DIA East Alignment <br />Transmission Alternative 3- Monaghan Road Alignment. <br />All three alignments start at the North Campus natural purification facilities located near <br />Brighton. Each route offered distinct advantages pertaining to pipeline length; <br />environmental factors; number of highway, railroad, irrigation ditch, stream, and utility <br />crossings; number of landowners; and the extent of developed land traversed by the <br />pipeline. Based on evaluation of the three alternatives, Alternative 1, the E-470 alignment, <br />was carried forward as the preferred pipeline alignment. This alternative was selected <br />primarily to streamline right-of-way acquisition and because it presented the fewest <br />environmental impacts. <br />Pumping stations are needed to lift the water approximately 1000 feet from the North <br />Campus to the purification facilities at the South Campus (also known as the Aurora <br />Reservoir Water Purification Facility or ARWPF). Locations for the pumping stations were <br />ideniified at interim points along the conveyance system so that the same pump motor <br />horsepower would be required at each of the pumping stations. Alternative sites were then <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.