Laserfiche WebLink
amee Slr� <br />Memorandum <br />To: Taryn Hutchins - Cabibi, Veva Deheza, <br />Water Conservation and Drought Planning Section <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />cc: <br />From: Ben Harding <br />Subject: Scope of Work for Refined Drought Statistics <br />Date: August 18, 2010 <br />This memorandum presents a scope of work and cost estimate for enhancement of the <br />spell statistics used in the CWCB Drought Vulnerability Assessment. These <br />enhancements will involve 1) calculating spell statistics for projected climate- impacted <br />flows against the mean flow from the historic record, 1950 — 2005, and 2) calculating <br />spell statistics and return periods from a single, long synthetic trace. <br />Task 1: Calculate spell statistics against historic mean. <br />Spell statistics that were calculated for the CWCB Drought Vulnerability Assessment <br />were calculated against the mean flow of each individual trace. In order to put projected <br />future spells in the context of recent historic conditions, the threshold used to define a <br />spell will be modified to be the mean of the historic natural flow trace. This task will <br />involve modification of the computer codes used to calculate the basic spell statistics, <br />0 <br />revisions to the codes that calculate the statistics presented in the Vulnerability <br />Assessment, <br />revisions to the codes that produce the box plots of spell statistics, and <br />testing and validation. The modified codes will be run against each of the ten projected <br />climate cases to produce a separate estimate of spell statistics for each case. <br />Task 2: Calculate spell statistics against a single long trace <br />Spell statistics calculated for the Colorado River Water Availability Study and used in the <br />Drought Vulnerability Assessment were calculated on the basis of a set of 100 56 -year <br />traces of natural flows. This was done so that projected future droughts could be put in <br />the context of the drought of record over the 56 -year period from 1950 through 2005. An <br />alternative approach is to calculate the statistics of spells with a giv return i nterval. In l <br />order to calculate statistics of spells with long return intervals this analysis should_be ` <br />done against a long synthetic trace. This task will involve modifying the computer codes <br />that implement the stochastic model used to generate streamflow traces so as to <br />produce a single long trace, developing a new code to calculate the basic spell statistics <br />from a single long trace and to report those statistics along with return intervals, and <br />testing and validation. These codes will be used to generate long traces for each of the <br />ten projected climate cases and to develop separate estimates of spell statistics for each <br />of those cases. <br />AMEC Earth & Environmental <br />Boulder Office <br />1002 Walnut Street, Suite 200 <br />Boulder, CO 80302 www.amec.com <br />Phone +1 (303) 443 -7839 <br />FAX +1 (303) 442 -0616 <br />