Laserfiche WebLink
\� v <br />• <br />E <br />Table 2: Recommended Landsat Imagery for 2003 Irrigated Lands Assessment <br />Frame <br />Path/ <br />Acquisition <br />Image ID <br />Sensor <br />Cloud <br />Comments <br />Cost <br />Path/Row <br />Date <br />Type <br />Cover <br />Row <br />7/4/2003 <br />5034033000318510 <br />TM5 <br />0% <br />Small clouds over NE corner of <br />$450 <br />31/34 <br />4/18/2003 <br />7031034000310850 <br />TM7 <br />0% <br />Good quality; no clouds evident <br />over Arkansas river irrigated lands; <br />$ 600 <br />33/34 <br />6/27/2003 <br />5033034000317810 <br />TM5 <br />0 % <br />Some clouds in the center and <br />$450 <br />31/34 <br />5/12/2003 <br />5031034000313210 <br />TM5 <br />10 % <br />western sections of the image; no <br />$ 450 <br />32/33 <br />7/6/2003 <br />5032033000318710 <br />TM5 <br />0% <br />clouds evident over Arkansas river <br />$450 <br />irrigated lands; <br />31/33 <br />5/12/2003 <br />5031033000313210 <br />TM5 <br />0 % <br />Some clouds in the SW sections of <br />$450 <br />31/34 <br />7/31/2003 <br />5031034000321210 <br />TM5 <br />10 % <br />the image; probable haze over <br />Arkansas river irrigated lands; <br />$ 450 <br />Shipping, Handling, and Contingency (10 %) <br />$ 194 <br />Total Cost of Additional Raw Landsat Imagery <br />$1,994 <br />could substitute June image; <br />Some clouds in the SE sections of <br />31/34 <br />9/1/2003 <br />5031034000324410 <br />TM5 <br />20% <br />the image; probable haze over <br />$ 450 <br />Arkansas river irrigated lands; <br />31/34 <br />10/19/2003 <br />5031034000329210 <br />TM5 <br />0 % <br />Good quality; no clouds evident <br />over Arkansas river irrigated lands; <br />$ 450 <br />Shipping, Handling, and Contingency (10 %) <br />$ 720 <br />Total Cost of Raw Landsat Imagery <br />$7920 <br />4. Additional Landsat Imagery to Complete Coverage of Division 2 <br />Division 2 personnel expressed an interest in acquiring complete Landsat image coverage for all of the <br />division for use in overall management. In addition to the Landsat images described above, Table 3 shows <br />a list of recommend Landsat imagery that would cover the remaining areas of Division 2. Only a single <br />date for these additional satellite image frames is required. <br />Table 3: Recommended Landsat Imagery to Complete Coverage of Division 2 <br />Frame <br />Acquisition <br />Image ID <br />Sensor <br />Cloud <br />Comments <br />Cost <br />Path/Row <br />Date <br />Type <br />Cover <br />34/33 <br />7/4/2003 <br />5034033000318510 <br />TM5 <br />0% <br />Small clouds over NE corner of <br />$450 <br />scene; <br />33/34 <br />6/27/2003 <br />5033034000317810 <br />TM5 <br />0 % <br />Small clouds over center corner of <br />$450 <br />scene; <br />32/33 <br />7/6/2003 <br />5032033000318710 <br />TM5 <br />0% <br />Probable haze over Arkansas river <br />$450 <br />irrigated lands; <br />31/33 <br />5/12/2003 <br />5031033000313210 <br />TM5 <br />0 % <br />No clouds evident in the <br />$450 <br />thumbnail; <br />Shipping, Handling, and Contingency (10 %) <br />$ 194 <br />Total Cost of Additional Raw Landsat Imagery <br />$1,994 <br />Page 3 of 4 P Riverside Technology, Inc. <br />Water Resources Engineering and Consuiting <br />