Laserfiche WebLink
6 Multi- hazard <br />Data Layer <br />6(a) 2002 <br />Content Manager <br />N/A Polygons <br />statewide N/A <br />Wildfire polygons projected • Regular update of this data layer will <br />Data Grou p <br />Name and <br />Source / <br />Metadata Available <br />Spatial Data <br />Extent <br />(CM) and other <br />Key Pre - Integration <br />Comments <br /># <br />() <br />Description <br />Contact <br />() 4 <br />Format <br />(6) <br />aspatial <br />Processing Tasks <br />(9) <br />(italics) <br />(3) <br />(5) <br />information <br />(8) <br />delivery to the channel, leading to damaging <br />(2) <br />debris flow conditions. <br />6(b) Geologic <br />7 <br />Yes- detailed Polygons <br />Larimer N/A <br />6 Multi- hazard <br />6(a) 2002 <br />CWCB <br />N/A Polygons <br />statewide N/A <br />Wildfire polygons projected • Regular update of this data layer will <br />Wildfires <br />to <br />provide flood managers with information <br />NAD_1983_UTM _Zone_13 regarding the potential for potential flood <br />N. Data entered into <br />situations to be exacerbated by availability of <br />project mxd and <br />soil and other material for ready transport and <br />symbolized. <br />delivery to the channel, leading to damaging <br />debris flow conditions. <br />6(b) Geologic <br />Larimer County <br />Yes- detailed Polygons <br />Larimer N/A <br />Geo -haz polygons <br />• Shapefile (called geohaz_Ic) includes <br />Hazards <br />Jeff Stark <br />hardcopy <br />County <br />projected to <br />various geologic hazard themes such as land <br />GIS Section (IT <br />document describing <br />NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_13 slide areas, debris fan areas, <br />Division) <br />data attributes, <br />N. Data entered into <br />flash flood channels, and high water table <br />Larimer County <br />developed by the <br />project mxd and <br />areas. <br />Phone: (970) <br />consultant involved <br />symbolized. <br />• This type of geologic hazard data may <br />498 -5024 <br />(Robinson <br />provide managers with a greater <br />email: <br />Engineering) <br />understanding of factors potentially <br />starkjd @larimer <br />exacerbating floods and flood - related <br />.org <br />damage. <br />• Similar data are likely to be available for <br />other counties in Colorado, but may have <br />different classifications, making comparisons <br />and development of a standard legend <br />d ifficu It. <br />6(c) Wildfire <br />As above <br />Yes- detailed Polygons <br />Larimer N/A <br />Wildfire hazard polygons <br />• Layer is based on cover type, habitat <br />Hazards <br />hardcopy <br />County <br />projected to <br />structure stage, and primary terrain <br />document describing <br />NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_13 <br />parameters. <br />data attributes, <br />N. Data entered into <br />• This is used to develop a hazard ranking <br />hazard ranking <br />project mxd and <br />based on fuel characteristics and flammability <br />system, and <br />symbolized. <br />potential. <br />methods. <br />• Utility for the Flood DSS would likely be <br />limited to mitigation planning. For example <br />identifying areas of future potential post -fire <br />erosion and hence exacerbated flooding <br />effects should a heavy rainfall event occur <br />some time after the fire had occurred. This <br />type of analysis could lead to multi- hazard <br />ranking and mapping, but the data would be <br />of limited use for short term planning. <br />22 <br />