Laserfiche WebLink
4(b) <br />Central <br />Data Layer <br />N/A <br />Polygons <br />Rocky mountains N/A <br />was interrogated, <br />Content Manager <br />Rocky <br />Data Group <br />Name and <br />Source / <br />Metadata Available <br />Spatial Data <br />Extent <br />(CM) and other <br />Key Pre - integration <br />Comments <br /># <br />() <br />Description <br />Contact <br />4 <br />() <br />Format <br />6 <br />() <br />aspatial <br />Processing Tasks <br />9 <br />( ) <br />representative data <br />(italics) <br />(3) <br />(5) <br />information <br />(8) <br />2 <br />Flood DSS. This <br />7 <br />4(b) <br />Central <br />CWCB <br />N/A <br />Polygons <br />Rocky mountains N/A <br />was interrogated, <br />Rocky <br />organized as best as <br />Mountain <br />possible, and <br />Target Areas <br />representative data <br />extracted for inclusion in <br />Flood DSS. This <br />information was projected <br />to NAD_1983_UTM <br />—Zone and given <br />symbols. <br />5 Flood <br />Control <br />5(a) <br />DWR Dams <br />DWR <br />Yes <br />Points <br />Statewide N/A <br />DWR Dams projected to <br />• DWR approved CWCB to supply RTi with <br />NAD_1983_UTM_ Zone _13 this data. <br />N. Data entered into <br />• Security issue raised by the sensitivity of <br />project mxd and <br />this data highlights discussion point for State <br />symbolized. <br />- Will certain layers of full Flood DSS need to <br />be excluded or remain internal to <br />CWCB /DWR if DSS is made publicly <br />available? <br />5(b) <br />Dams <br />City of Fort <br />N/A <br />Lines <br />Larimer County N/A <br />Dams projected to <br />• Dams from 'DFIRM Structures' layer was <br />Collins <br />NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_13 originally integrated to provide example if the <br />Katy Carpenter, <br />N. Data entered into <br />DWR dams data was not cleared for inclusion <br />GISP <br />project mxd and <br />by DWR. <br />GIS <br />symbolized. <br />• Data was left in the prototype to provide an <br />Programmer /An <br />example of more spatially detailed example <br />alyst <br />(line traces the extent of the dam structure <br />Phone: (970) <br />rather than a point location), and attribute <br />416 -2048 <br />data does not identify the <br />security /vulnerability of the dam. <br />5(c) <br />Levees <br />City of Fort <br />N/A <br />Lines <br />City of Fort N/A <br />• Larimer County does not hold a flood <br />Collins <br />Collins <br />control /levee database. <br />• With the intention of incorporating an <br />example from another County, RTi contacted <br />Pueblo City (Dennis Moroney) - they have yet <br />to map their levee system of — 2miles, and <br />won't have this data for another year. <br />• This and other calls indicated there will <br />likely be a paucity of levee information <br />statewide. <br />21 <br />