Laserfiche WebLink
.0 3sw <br />The application did not ir.ontion hater use and p;^oblcns. <br />The e=rdnation, however, rc� °o:a? ed considerable- evidenca of e:.cessiv3 <br />seepage losses from the irrigation ca::als. There is an u°adete3rr.ined <br />though substwitial acreage of land that hao a high water table. This <br />land is now usad for pasture. Reduction of canal a3opage losses and <br />drainage of core lands when drainkgo is feasible would result in better <br />use of soil and water resources. At than tine there is ono <br />oper,..ting dr-- .nrZe district nora_*- •'eldona covering 11 farria. <br />4. Project Objectives. <br />The application points out the need for land treattont reaeraree in <br />the w- atershed. The measures onumorated are the typed that would xwke <br />the greatest contribution to the alleviation of the floodwatcr, sG L —,ont <br />and erosion problems. The Morgan SCD has Leon organized leas than a <br />y3ar.and no basic conservation plan; have been prepared for the ;good <br />source area. Howovor, 35 stock tu*s have been built by base owncra <br />in crder to secure better grass u anagersent. The prosent level of grass <br />raanagcr.ent and crop residue management, appears ai s to be about average for <br />this part of the country. The president of the Forgan SCD beliovea <br />that the present land ownera will nat {e substantial progress in applying <br />tho noedcd land treatment tveaasures when they understand them. They <br />appear to be financially able to install tho needed land treatment <br />mea$sres with the coot sharing ;assistance available through the ACP. <br />Shortage of teclAmieal assistance ur0cubtedly account for the lack of <br />basic conservation plans. <br />Practically no structural ' measures for flood prevention havo been <br />constructed. One ,:;x,11 retarding structure has boon Comploted only <br />recently. The two irrigation c=paries hav3 provided a dogree of <br />flood protection to their canals although thio has been inadequate. <br />The ?.iverside Cfnal has several spillways for unloading floodwater <br />getting into the canal. It has a eiphon across Fope- Bishop Draw. <br />Exodpt for a flume across Cottonwood Creek, the j:oldon Valley Ditch <br />has no structures at locations where the anal crosses the stream, <br />channels. <br />There appears to be a definite nood for structures I nneaiately above <br />the irrigated land to retard the flood run - off sufficiently to pe:tnit <br />Ito disposal in natural chanrals or irrigation canals without datm e. <br />This may be accoriplished by floodwater retarding rtractures or <br />spreaders in those areas that are topographically suitod to such <br />treatment. In order to conply :��ith water laws, retarding structures <br />mould have to be provided with unrated outlet tubes to reloase the <br />water as rapidly as practicable. If irrigation canals are used to <br />dispose of the floodwater to the South .Platte .liver r-onto Increaso in <br />capacity may be required. This type of improvement dcas not appear <br />to be very costly. Diversion dikes are needed to prevent dac':age to <br />the upstream bar4cs of irrigation canals and to minirdze the sedimont <br />problem. Casual examination Indicates that foundation and f l3 <br />material is satisfactory. <br />