My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CWCB vs. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District - Adjudication of RICD under SB 01-216
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
CWCB vs. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District - Adjudication of RICD under SB 01-216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2010 12:39:05 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 3:45:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Gunnison RICD
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/14/2005
Author
CWCB, Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District
Title
CWCB vs. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District - Adjudication of RICD under SB 01-216
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
water by a county, municipality, city and <br />county, water district, water and sanitation <br />district, water conservation district, or <br />water conservancy district for recreational <br />in- channel diversion purposes . . . . <br />37- 92- 103(4) (emphasis added). Thus, beneficial use now <br />expressly includes diversions of water "for recreational in- <br />channel diversion purposes." To give full effect to the General <br />Assembly's intent, we thereby are directed to the definition of <br />a RICD, see Bil Boom 961 P.2d at 470: <br />"Recreational in- channel diversion" means <br />the minimum stream flow as it is diverted, <br />captured, controlled, and placed to <br />beneficial use between specific points <br />defined by physical control structures <br />pursuant to an application filed by a <br />county, municipality, city and county, water <br />district, water and sanitation district, <br />water conservation district, or water <br />conservancy district for a reasonable <br />recreation experience in and on the water. <br />37- 92- 103(10.3). <br />Reading the two definitions together as we must, see Bill <br />Boom 961 P.2d at 470, and construing them as written, see, <br />e.g. Pierson 48 P.3d at 1218 -19, it is clear that the General <br />Assembly intended beneficial use to encompass in- channel <br />recreational uses of water, but only those uses which are <br />limited to the "minimum stream flow" "for a reasonable <br />recreation experience in and on the water." If an in- channel <br />recreational appropriator seeks more than the minimum stream <br />flow for a reasonable recreation experience in and on the water, <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.