My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Environmental Impact Statement - Scope of Work
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Environmental Impact Statement - Scope of Work
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2010 1:10:09 PM
Creation date
7/12/2010 12:26:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Flaming Gorge Reservoir
State
CO
UT
WY
Basin
Yampa/White/Green
Water Division
6
Date
5/22/2007
Author
Million Resource Conservation Group
Title
Environmental Impact Statement - Scope of Work
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
May 22, 2007 <br />Assume Class III Surveys for miultiple sites <br />Ethnographic Surveys <br />Mitigation negotiations and plan development <br />Native Americans Consultation <br />Development of Programmatic Agreement /MOU <br />h. Recreational Resources <br />Recreational Surveys <br />i. Transportation <br />j. Visual /Aesthetics <br />k. Hazardous Material <br />1. Adverse Effects which cannot be avoided <br />m. Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources <br />n. Cumulative Impacts and Effects Analysis <br />Subtask 3.4 Environmental Consequences <br />For each of the practicable alternatives, the Consultant will complete a <br />detailed analysis of impacts resulting from project construction and <br />operation. The Consultant will complete the studies, inventories, and <br />surveys needed to complete the impact analysis. The Consultant shall work <br />closely with MRCG and its consultants to avoid any duplication of effort. <br />The effects of project construction and operation for each of the practicable <br />alternatives must be assessed considering the environmental parameters <br />listed in Subtask 3.3- Affected Environment <br />The Consultant shall prepare a matrix table to be utilized for screening of <br />practicable alternatives. The table should compare factors such as cost, <br />logistics and technology, impacts to aquatic resources, and other <br />environmental factors. <br />The Consultant shall fully describe environmental consequences of <br />implementing the practicable alternatives on the environmental parameters <br />listed in Subtask 3.3. <br />Specific consideration will be given to the following: <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.