My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Summary Report 1991-97
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Summary Report 1991-97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2010 1:10:22 PM
Creation date
7/2/2010 2:53:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program
State
CO
NM
UT
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
12/1/1997
Author
Paul B. Holden, William Masslich, Bio/West Inc.
Title
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Summary Report 1991-97
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1988 (Platania 1990). Adult razorback sucker have been collected from shoreline habitats in the San <br />Juan Arm of Lake Powell. <br />To study razorback sucker habitat use in the San Juan River, on March 22, 1994, the Program <br />stocked five radio - tagged (6 -month duration tags) subadult (mean TL = 277 mm) razorback suckers <br />(reared from San Juan Arm of Lake Powell brood stock) into the river at Bluff (RM 79.6), five at the <br />Four Corners Bridge (RM 119.2), and five above the Mixer in New Mexico (RM 136.6) (Ryden and <br />Pfeifer 1995b). Six of these fish were monitored during the remainder of 1994, and the other fish <br />were monitored for shorter periods of time. Similar to habitat use in the Green River System, the <br />radio - tagged razorback sucker used primarily slow water habitats in March and April, including <br />eddies, pools, backwaters, and shoals that were typically warmer than the mainchannel habitats <br />(Ryden and Pfeifer 1995b). During June and August, mainchannel fast water run habitats were used <br />the most by the radio - tagged razorback sucker. This information indicated that subadult razorback <br />sucker stocked in the San Juan River selected habitats on a seasonal basis that were very similar to <br />habitats selected by adults in the Green River (Tyus 1987). Ryden and Pfeifer (1995b) indicated that <br />the slow water habitats used in the spring were relatively rare habitats in the river, whereas the runs <br />used in the summer were fairly common habitats. <br />On October 27, 1994, 16 additional razorback sucker equipped with 2 -year radio -tags were stocked <br />at the same sites as the spring 1994 stocking (Ryden and Pfeifer 1996b). These fish were of the same <br />cohort as the fish stocked in March, but were larger, averaging 403 mm TL. In September 1995, 16 <br />additional razorback sucker were radio - tagged and stocked in the same locations in the San Juan <br />River. Information on habitat use obtained through 46 contacts with radio - tagged fish during <br />1995. Unlike the spring 1994 samples, razorback sucker in spring 1995 primarily used mainstream <br />run habitat rather than slow water habitats. These habitats were the same temperature as most of the <br />remainder of the river. Runs continued to be the favored habitat throughout the remainder of 1995, <br />with only June observations showing significant use of low velocity habitats. Reasons for the <br />apparent change in preferred habitat between 1994 and 1995 are not known but may be related to <br />differences in size of the fish and differences in flow during these 2 years. <br />As part of integration efforts for the 7 -year research effort, habitat preference information of radio - <br />tagged, stocked, adult razorback suckers have been developed by Ryden (1997b) by comparing <br />habitats used to habitats available in the vicinity of the fish. These data were presented by season, <br />month, and by geomorphic reach to aid in the development of flow recommendations for this <br />species. By season, the data indicated that radio - tagged razorback suckers used a variety of habitats <br />but showed some preference for pools and eddies in spring (March, April, and May), for eddies in <br />summer (June, July, and August), used runs exclusively in fall (September, October, and November), <br />and preferred edge pools during winter (December, January, and February). <br />Because relatively few young razorback sucker have been captured, habitat requirements are difficult <br />to determine. Recent theory is that larval razorback sucker use warm, flooded bottomlands during <br />spring runoff. Relatively high numbers of YOY razorback sucker have been found in such habitats <br />along the Green River following high spring flows (Modde 1996). Reduction of spring flooding due <br />to dams has reduced the availability of this habitat type and may be the reason so few young <br />razorback sucker have been found during intensive sampling efforts in recent years. The few <br />juveniles that have been collected from the mainstream river have generally been found in <br />backwaters (Minckley et al. 1991). <br />San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program December 1997 <br />Summary Report 21 PR -602 -1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.