My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Summary Report 1991-97
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Summary Report 1991-97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2010 1:10:22 PM
Creation date
7/2/2010 2:53:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program
State
CO
NM
UT
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
12/1/1997
Author
Paul B. Holden, William Masslich, Bio/West Inc.
Title
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Summary Report 1991-97
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� I <br />water temperatures tend to be cooler than the main channel, while in the summer the situation is <br />reversed with backwater temperatures warmer than the main channel. Consequently, preference for <br />backwater habitats during summer and avoidance of the same areas during winter may be primarily <br />a response to temperature differences. Ongoing research and further analysis of data on habitat use <br />of stocked YOY Colorado squawfish should provide valuable insights into habitat preferences of the <br />' early life stages of this species in the San Juan River. <br />Juvenile and subadult Colorado squawfish (yearlings and older) are less frequently collected than <br />YOY or adults and have been collected from a variety of habitats in the Upper Basin —from <br />backwaters to more riverine habitats. It appears that as young Colorado squawfish grow, they use <br />more of the main channel and have the ability to move upstream and into tributaries. Until 1997, <br />only a few juvenile Colorado squawfish had been collected in the San Juan River, including two <br />yearlings collected in a backwater in 1994 and two subadults (300 -400 mm TL) collected in the main <br />channel in 1996. The stocking of YOY Colorado squawfish in 1996 resulted in the capture of <br />' numerous yearlings in late 1997. As noted above, the habitats used by the yearlings tended to be low <br />velocity but fit the general pattern seen in other portions of the Upper Basin in that they were <br />collected in more mainchannel habitats with current. <br />Razorback Sucker <br />Razorback sucker in the Upper Colorado River Basin have been less studied than Colorado <br />squawfish, so habitat preferences are not as well understood. In the Upper Green River System, <br />spawning occurs at two primary "spawning bars," in the mouth of the Yampa River and in the <br />mainstem Green River (McAda and Wydoski 1980, Tyus 1987). Substrate in the spawning bars is <br />cobble, gravel, and coarse sand. The razorback sucker is one of the first native fishes to spawn <br />during the year, with spawning occurring during spring runoff, typically in May. Some authors have <br />suggested that spawning may also occur in backwater habitats based on the occurrence of ripe fish <br />in those habitats. Successful spawning also occurs along reservoir shorelines in the Lower Colorado <br />M River (Minckley et al. 1991). <br />Adult razorback sucker have been collected in a variety of habitats but have been primarily found <br />in the spring in backwaters, eddies, and the flooded mouths of tributary streams. All of these areas <br />are typically warmer than the mainstem rivers. Razorback sucker are often caught in association <br />with Colorado squawfish, which also use these habitats. Following spawning and as the rivers <br />recede, razorback sucker are much more difficult to locate. Tyus (1987) tracked six radio - tagged <br />razorback sucker in the Green River and was surprised to find they primarily used midchannel sand <br />bars in the summer, habitats not easily sampled by collectors. During the springtime, near -shore <br />runs were utilized by radio - tagged razorback sucker, although previous sampling typically yielded <br />most razorback sucker from backwater habitats during spring. This difference in spring habitat use <br />may have been caused by the effects of radio - tagging procedures on spawning behavior of the fish. <br />More recent radio - tagging studies in the upper Green River (Modde and Irving 1995) found that <br />razorback sucker used deep runs and eddies during the summer, and that movement to the spawning <br />areas appeared to be triggered by increased flow. <br />Very little is known about razorback sucker habitat requirements in the San Juan River since few of <br />these fish have been collected in recent times. Only one wild razorback sucker has been found since <br />1987 in the study area. This adult was collected from a mainchannel run near Bluff, Utah, in April <br />San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program December 1997 <br />Summary Report 20 PR -602 -1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.