My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Factor III Guidelines and Originality
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Factor III Guidelines and Originality
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2010 1:18:53 PM
Creation date
7/2/2010 1:07:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Yampa River Management Plan
State
CO
UT
WY
Basin
Yampa/White/Green
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/3000
Title
Factor III Guidelines and Originality
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Scientific Accomplishments <br />i <br />Until recently, White's research has been directed toward management- oriented <br />problems related to aquatic habitat - salmonid population interactions. Studies <br />have almost always been designed to meet an impending management need, thus <br />providing useful information for immediate application to improve resource <br />conservation. Research efforts have focused on instream flow problems, <br />hydropower development, and land use practices (approximately 50% of <br />research). Other studies have been directed at a broad spectrum of management <br />problems. Although salmonid studies continue, White's present emphasis is on <br />large rivers and associated rare His accomplishments in these areas are <br />described below. <br />1. Since Last Promotion <br />Instream Flow <br />Stream flow depletion is a serious aquatic resource problem in Montana and <br />throughout the West. White's expertise and interest in instream flow issues were <br />major factors in his selection for the Montana Unit Leader position. Solutions to <br />instream flow problems are based on an understanding of habitat requirements <br />of fish, how they are influenced by flow, and how this information can be used to <br />predict effects of flow modification or to recommend suitable instream flow for <br />target fish species. White's research has been directed toward contributing to <br />these types of information needs. <br />Validation When White transferred to Montana, he was asked by state <br />cooperators to seek funds to begin research on validation of the state's approach <br />to reserving flows for trout. White was very familiar with the wetted perimeter <br />method used in Montana since he was involved in its original formulation (1,2). In <br />examining the application of the approach (which had been upheld by Montana <br />courts), White found that validation was based on long -term flow -trout population <br />data in large streams, yet the method was being applied to all streams in the state. <br />The first research effort designed by White was to test its validity in small streams. <br />The research was funded by The Montana Water Resources Research Institute, <br />and an MS student was taken. The study, involving population and flow <br />manipulation, showed that wetted perimeter was not a consistent index of summer <br />habitat suitability for trout; it worked well in pool /riff le habitats but underestimated <br />the amount of water necessary in run -riffle habitat. (32, 65 and MT Chapter AFS) <br />Results are being used by MTFWP. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.