Laserfiche WebLink
- 2 - <br />Date Town or Organization Remarks <br />Sept. 12, 1951 <br />Sept. 13,.1951 <br />Sept. 13, 1951 <br />Sept. 13, 1951 <br />Oct. lb, 1951 <br />Oct. 23, 1951 <br />Riverside Irrigation Dist. <br />Weldon Valley Associa- <br />tion <br />Weldon Valley Ditch <br />Association <br />Ft. Morgan Reservoir and <br />Irrigation Company <br />Jackson Lake Reservoir and <br />Irrigation Company <br />William B. Paynter <br />(Brush Civic Club, <br />Colorado) <br />Not suited to their needs or <br />thoroughly justified. Re- <br />commend additional channel <br />storage be provided in other <br />locations after comprehensive <br />basin studies are completed,- <br />Create great personal hard- <br />ships to individuals, school <br />districts, and other organi- <br />zations in the valley and <br />would remove taxes and reve- <br />nue from Morgan County. Re- <br />commend control of Bijou and <br />Kiowa Creeks and upstream <br />flood control and storage <br />facilities. Final basin <br />surveys should be completed <br />before decisions are made. <br />Create hardship on farmers <br />served by this ditch in find= <br />ing comparable farms. <br />Withhold approval until agree- <br />ments are made on the follow- <br />ing: rights for refilling, <br />court order approving change <br />in point of diversion of Ft. <br />Morgan Canal, more definite <br />solution of the Weldon Val- <br />ley Ditch water, and water <br />rights for new lands be <br />junior to present reservoir <br />decrees. Approve building <br />of a channel reservoir and <br />location of proposed damsite <br />and proposed control of Bijou <br />Creek. <br />Reaffirmed opposition as ex. <br />Brush, pressed in Resolution of <br />June b, 1949. <br />1st National Bank of Ft. <br />Morgan <br />Loss of rich farm land, Other <br />sites more feasible, Favor <br />small dams on headwaters of <br />tributaries. Cost of dam <br />would exceed economical bene- <br />fits.. Loss of Weldona busi- <br />ness and tax revenue would be <br />irreplacable. <br />