My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150156 FS
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
C150156 FS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2011 9:59:35 AM
Creation date
6/24/2010 2:06:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150156
Contractor Name
Arkansas Groundwater Users Association
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
14
County
Pueblo
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' <br />' <br />� <br />' <br />, <br />�� <br />' <br />, <br />' <br />' <br />' <br />�I <br />� <br />J <br />' <br />' <br />' <br />' <br />' <br />(CSU) for their excess municipal return flows available on Fountain Creek. Because of conditions on the <br />river, CSU was unable to exchange their return flows into Pueblo Reservoir for storage and sold <br />approximately 2000 acre-feet to AGUA for $18 per acre-foot. AGUA also constructed two recharge <br />ponds through which they diverted replacement water during winter months when they had excess water <br />available. This allowed them to retain the replacement credit for AGUA's use and provide the credits in a <br />lagged manner every month of the year for several years. <br />Total Replacement Sources <br />At the time of submittal of the March 1, 2002 Plan, AGUA anticipated securing approximately 13,745 <br />acre-feet of augmentation water for the 2002 plan year to meet approximately 13,625 acre-feet of stream <br />depletions. Credits carried over from the 2001 plan year and transit losses charged on Fountain Creek <br />were also calculated in the plan and accounts for the difference between the projected depletions and <br />projected replacement. <br />Of the 12,815 acre-feet of replacement water AGUA anticipated receiving from Pueblo, SECWCD and <br />Cherokee far the 2002 plan year, they received only 5,769 acre-feet. This caused AGUA to have to <br />amend their plan to reduce pumping allowed by their members and find alternative augmentation water <br />sources. <br />For comparison purposes: In the 2003 Plan AGUA projected 1,248 acre-feet of replacement credit from <br />2,689 shares of owned and leased Excelsior Ditch, 1,661 acre-feet from SECWCD, 1,102 acre-feet from <br />Cherokee, 78 acre-feet from Union Ditch shares and had approximately 225 acre-feet of Las Animas <br />Consolidated Article III water carried over from 2002. Replacement credits expected to be available to <br />AGUA for the 2003 plan year before losses totaled only 4,314 acre-feet. AGUA also offered an <br />augmentation scheme to its members owning ditch shares to provide those shares to AGUA for <br />augmentation of their well pumping. Excelsior Ditch irrigators, the Fremont School District (Union <br />Ditch, 78 acre-feet) and Catlin Canal irrigators participated. <br />' AGUA — 2003 Feasibility Study - 12 - August 15, 2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.