My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
South Platte Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
South Platte Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2010 3:41:20 PM
Creation date
6/23/2010 1:06:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
South Platte Steering Committee
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
10/6/1961
Author
South Platte Steering Committee
Title
South Platte Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 4 <br />committee, must make up their minds that some <br />specific thing is going to have to be done and <br />take out on that particular thing and get it done. <br />The matter of exchange potential as between <br />the two sites has been pointed out here. Actually <br />I don't believe that there is any great difference <br />in the exchange potential in the water utilization <br />as between the two sites. I think both sites very <br />closely utilize the full physical capacity and. <br />there is less site in either case than there is <br />water, and you can get the same kinds of benefits <br />in exchange. Not to the same lands, of course, <br />because there is a space between the two sites, <br />that's true. <br />Another point that I might mention.here is <br />the matter of authorization. The Narrows Unit is <br />authorized. The Weld County site may be included <br />in that authorization. That is a specific that <br />would take some determination. I couldn't answer <br />the question. I don't know whether it is or not. <br />There is a question that if the study is expanded <br />to a basin -wide one that takes in the Cache la <br />Poudre, the Thompson, the Two Forks, all of those <br />things, it would seem that there.would belittle <br />question that that was not authorized. We might <br />lose the authorization. Consider that for what <br />it's worth. <br />From my uninformed standpoint of the last. <br />month or two, I think that pretty well covers my <br />thoughts." <br />MR. GILDERSLEEVE: "Mr. Barkley, did you have something to say ?" <br />MR. BARKLEY: "Just a comment or two on Mr. Knights' re- <br />marks. It could be done in another year with <br />another $100,000. This was stated to us as a <br />committee the last time we were here so this is <br />not my estimate. I would agree with you that it <br />would take more time and more money. But I would <br />also say that in this wheel spinning that has <br />taken place to the tune of $1� million so far, <br />and has thus far accomplished nothing, I'm not <br />so sure another half million dollars that we are <br />talking about now for a piece -meal job is going <br />-15- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.