Laserfiche WebLink
Guy: seems like it should be concern of board eventually a suit come forward. <br />RK operate on basis not good to fool mother nature. Grand Canyon sediment washed it right out. <br />If load followed could drive sand into beaches. Are unanticipated consequences, probably civil <br />law issues. Know for land if build house and change drainage damage to neighbor <br />Dave a lot handled through Corps permits. <br />RK think these all come through individual permits. If large amounts of water in local not <br />nationwide. Raise liability issue. What happens when corridor altered and create attractive <br />nuisance. How many dead each year? <br />Audience, average of 4. <br />RK if improvements, changes made that create rapid areas, holes that hold boats, if injuries or <br />loss of life, who has liability. Whoever creates it will prob have some liability. Right now under <br />gov immunity. Up to 400k, pi attorneys are experts at getting around. <br />DT not just loss of life, also injury. <br />Guy commercial guys have insurance. <br />DT what we're talking about is play areas. Spouses. And why no Arkansas on power point? <br />RK appreciate attendance. <br />TK can make written comments <br />DT have to come down. Ron and I will submit written comments. Boat chutes here in town and <br />Buena Vista ? Will be multi person effort and no one harmed when done. <br />Guys on upper ark have need for water and protect existing use. <br />Dave are you contact for any public who couldn't make it? <br />TK yes and a way on the board. <br />RK can get statute, proposed rules. Next Monday in Denver, Tue noon GS, Tue eve in SS. First <br />hearing in montrose (to comment that this rehersal). Final will be in Cortez. End of sept at that <br />point will ask board with motion to proceed to publish draft rules in CO register. Starts process <br />with formal adoption. Anticipate all done by Jan 1. <br />DT: Tried to get TU, Fred, but wouldn't come. <br />