My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reply Brief and Response Brief of Appleant, City of Thornton
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Reply Brief and Response Brief of Appleant, City of Thornton
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2010 1:11:58 PM
Creation date
6/11/2010 3:29:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Fort Collins and Thornton 86CW371
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
7/27/1991
Author
Michael D. White, Bruce D. Bernard, Teri L. Petitt
Title
Reply Brief and Response Brief of Appleant, City of Thornton
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
formally adopted Chapter Two of the Land Use Plan on February 18, 1986, does not mention any <br />intent or plan by Fort Collins to appropriate, divert or use water, and therefore fails to illustrate any <br />intent by Fort Collins to appropriate water on February 18, 1986. Ex. A -8, attached hereto as <br />Appendix C. <br />Although the testimony of two Fort Collins witnesses established that the decision to <br />construct the Nature Center Diversion Dam was not made until, at the earliest, some sixty to ninety <br />days after February 18, 1986, Fort Collins claims repeatedly throughout its brief that it intended to <br />appropriate the water sought herein on February 18, 1986, and that it "interpreted" the Land Use <br />Plan as a directive from the Fort Collins City Council to appropriate these water rights. Fort Collins <br />argues that the mere fact that the Nature Center Diversion Dam is located outside of the study area <br />of the Land Use Plan is not important because the plan was "interpreted" by City staff as a directive <br />to enhance and preserve flows in the Poudre River -- apparently including portions of the river not <br />even addressed by the Land Use Plan. Fort Collins Brief, pp. 12, 13, 14. <br />Fort Collins' argument ignores the fact that the "first step" upon which a date of <br />appropriation is based requires the concurrence on that date of an intent to appropriate and an overt <br />act providing notice of that intent to others. Twin Lakes supra, 557 P.2d at 828. As stated in <br />Fruitland Irriliation Company v Kruemling supra, 162 P. at 163: <br />The matter does not rest upon the intent of the claimant, but rather upon such <br />outward physical acts and manifestations in pursuance of such intent as may be <br />deemed sufficient to constitute notice to all who may come. <br />3 Terry Robinson testified that the decision to construct the dam was made sometime in late 1987 or early 1988. <br />Rec.Vol.III, p. 158, 1. 24 -25; p. 159, 1. 1. Michael Smith testified that the decision to construct the dam was made sixty to <br />ninety days after the February 1986 reconnaissance field trip. Rec.Vol.III, p. 229,1.6 -11. Mr. Smith also acknowledged that <br />he responded to a Thornton interrogatory stating that this decision was made two years later, in April of 1988. Rec.Vol.I1I, <br />p. 231, 1. 1 -16. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.