Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />i. the amount of remaining unappropriated Compact Entitlement <br />waters in the basin in q uestion• <br />ii. the proximity to the state line; <br />iii. the proximity of the RICD to suitable upstream points of diversion <br />or storage which may potentially be utilized by those who would <br />place the water to consumptive beneficial use; <br />iv. the absence of suitable downstream points of diversion or storage <br />for consumptive beneficial uses before the water leaves the state; <br />V. potential exchange opportunities within the state that may be <br />adversely impacted by the existence of the RICD; and <br />vi. any potential adverse impacts of the appropriation upon Compact <br />Entitlement delivery obligations. <br />b. Whether the RICD appropriation is for an appropriate reach of stream for <br />the intended use. The Board, in making this finding, may consider, but is <br />not limited to, the following factors: <br />i. The nature of the recreational activity sought; <br />ii. The length of the reach necessary to realize a reasonable <br />recreational experience; <br />iii. Whether the Applicant controls the water through the length of the <br />proposed reach; <br />iv. Whether additional gages or measuring devices are necessary for <br />proper administration of the RICD; <br />• <br />5 <br />