Laserfiche WebLink
w ` <br />R <br />convert old water rights to the detriment, as you <br />correctly said, of an upstream user, all our upstream <br />users that you better be aware of your obligation as <br />legislators to the water law of the State of Colorado <br />to see that it remains a creature of law not a <br />creature of wren who seek the changes. I talked to Mr <br />Jackson as recently as yesterday afternoon. When did <br />you speak him? <br />Saunders This morning. <br />McCormick This morning. Well that settles it. Yes, yesterday <br />afternoon Senator Bishop was presiding in the chair <br />following immediately following my conversation with <br />Mr. Jackson he spoke to me about and maybe you can <br />correct me on this, he had some language he was <br />looking at I Relieve at the top of page three and I <br />related that message to Senator and obviously I <br />have 'not been "able to talk to him. I didn't get the <br />chance to discuss all of the things that he has in <br />mind here, but clearly a. development that comes on <br />board in the still talking stage in 1987 is far down <br />the line of a 1983 enactment which seeks only to <br />clarify and underscore at this point and so I'm not <br />eager to have loved to death, I want to see it <br />have a chance to go through this Senate and hopefully <br />the House and certainly as it is now I <br />think not only give to the General Assembly <br />you tried to but public at large as to the issue <br />and I would certainly be pleased then to work with <br />you on the interim study that could further develop <br />the In all respect it is my intent to press <br />on with this. I want you to know that I would be —have <br />a ready ear for suggestions you make in that <br />Bishop Mr. Saunders, you want to make a final. comment ? <br />—34= <br />