My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Senate Bill 212 Transcript: Exhibit A-B
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Senate Bill 212 Transcript: Exhibit A-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2010 1:19:22 PM
Creation date
6/11/2010 11:40:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
SB 01-216, Recreational In-Channel Diversions
State
CO
Date
5/28/1987
Author
Senate Committee on Agricultre, Natural Resources and Energy
Title
Senate Bill 212 Transcript: Exhibit A-B
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Bishop Thank you very much Glen. Mr. McCormick, <br />McCormick You know I love you too much to try to you and <br />I have too much respect for-you to think that I <br />could However, Glen I think that - I concur <br />with the suggestion about studying I think <br />the parallel between this and the *other situation <br />where we actually _ did that _ that the study <br />could be in addition to rather than substitute for <br />this bill. When the hounds begin to bay at the moon, <br />you had batter listen and begin to move, and i feel <br />that absent this legislation this year that the <br />benefit of people who --in defiance of the 1973 <br />legislation clearly place their rights equal to those <br />of Colorado Water Conservation Board and are creating <br />this situation that we should speak to this at this <br />time. Let me state I have grave doubts about the. <br />inclusion of the Federal government. I did'so, as <br />much as anything, for discussion purposes. Lie <br />yourself, many of us are deeply troubles about <br />Federal R served R allegations, they are no more <br />than that and anything that functions to make the <br />Federal Government stand in line with other <br />Petitioners for rights under the Colorado <br />Constitution which they, the Federal Government, <br />reaffirmed in 1876 when we became a sovereign state. <br />We accepted the Federal Constitution, and they <br />affirmed our constitution, and you and so to <br />that end and we'll have singular omission today of <br />anything today about first in time, first in right, <br />which I regularly and correctly used in connection <br />with the Left Hand pitch. The first in time, first <br />in right in Colorado and this is one of the <br />proponents of instream flow; it's difficult to get an <br />instream flow.or a diversion with a junior right, <br />and where: people at a new point in time seek to <br />-29- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.