Laserfiche WebLink
of water <br />are recreation, <br />on this matter, <br />this are <br />they were <br />by have <br />bills prat <br />and there's not that you have <br />you know my concerns <br />I want to point out to you-that <br />greatly concerned about this bill, <br />as I do that <br />a good look at it. four <br />Bishop That was ; wasn't it. <br />Saunders concerned about realize that <br />this time we believe that congress 35 million <br />dollars a year. country 35 million dollars <br />education 8 million dollars lot me <br />reservoirs they are concerned reservoirs <br />may not get the benefit of the c'onsumers flow not <br />minimum flows but a regulated flow that they need to <br />preserve their recreation. Congress comes <br />along pick their pockets without getting their <br />feet wet, keep those things alive and there <br />are opportunities reservoirs sure <br />that the instrearn flow with those reservoirs <br />is They've got about 180 miles of stream <br />near if they wanted to and they <br />regarding instream flows necessary to <br />protect out in the hall when I was <br />getting a drink but told me that <br />and the Board had reached that's fine but look <br />the thing that is not law <br />Here's the , the meeting of the Water Board <br />on May 15th, the Board— opposition <br />the State of Colorado, let me statement of <br />opposition Case Number 5- 87CW04 <br />committee - water. That 1, 2, 3, 4, <br />5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 cases. There are people that <br />think that the present law does give them a right to <br />—26— <br />