Laserfiche WebLink
water water rights because of my <br />long association with the developer of water <br />rights water rights anything to stop <br />instream flow, somebody Colorado <br />River Colorado River Colorado instream <br />flow appropriation why then we'd better <br />have around T would like to <br />give .you <br />a reason for I think <br />Now both and Fred Anderson — as well <br />as one of the concerns of water law- <br />lawyers generally was instream flow _ <br />constitution of Colorado that the whole purpose of <br />the constitutional laws on environment is decided by <br />the common law, Common law says streams must be <br />permitted to flow undiminished <br />authority is reserved for people _ said that <br />the little were going to be all right as <br />far as was going to be river <br />They said you can not believe the water that _ <br />appropriated in 5o that is why 'the common law <br />is preserved entirely and I wish the Federal <br />Legislators up our rivers garbage <br />barges everyone should try to clean up his <br />own river – no question about that part of it. But <br />the undeminished we have destroyed by the <br />constitution. Now your legislation has the <br />effect on the these are already the <br />waters you pass a law the constitutional part <br />of that law-- whatever the law is–the law that you <br />passed the federally appropriated <br />Colorado the public. You understand <br />that instream flow ,so <br />nothing appropriate do something, lets <br />dismiss that, First, never be denied <br />and if the appropriation is my greatest <br />concern and I'm sure or not <br />–25– <br />