Laserfiche WebLink
,t <br /> The Pueblo Chieftain Online <br /> Select file then print to print this article. <br /> Publish Date: December 17, 2001 <br /> The Water Board "s suit <br /> EDITORIAL <br /> The Pueblo Chieftain <br /> THERE ETAS been some alarm around Pueblo regarding the lawsuit brought against the city by <br /> the Board of Water Works, Some see it has a waste of money to have one arm of local <br /> government suing another. <br /> But there are real issues here, the Board of Water Works believes it is right about those issues, <br /> and it has deckled to get the matter resolved in a court of law. <br /> At issue was the Water Board "s request to City Council for an ordinance clearing the way for the <br /> Board to sell water to Pueblo West as art emergency backup supply. After a hearing at which the <br /> Board was treated rudely by some Council refused to pass the ordinance as requested by the <br /> board. <br /> Now, some background. In 1954, the City Charter was adopted. That included the establishment <br /> of City Council and an independent, elected Board of Water Works. <br /> Regarding that Board, the Charter states: " "The entire control, management and operation (of the <br /> water system) shall be exercised by an independent Board named "Board of Water Works of <br /> Pueblo, Colorado," over which the Council shall have no, jurisdiction or control, but shall adopt <br /> all ordinances requested by said Board which shall be reasonably necessary to assist the Board <br /> in the management of the water works system and property" " (emphasis added). <br /> Further, the Charter states: 'Surplus water may be supplied to territories outside the City until <br /> same is needed by the inhabitants of the City. " <br /> It is clear to us that the authors of the City Charter intended to have the entire management of and <br /> policy regarding Pueblo "s water at the discretion of the Board of Water Works, and specifically <br /> they did not want water policy set by City Council. Yet, that was the erxd result of Council "s <br /> failure to pass the ordinance requested by the Board. <br /> Regarding surplus water, the Board contends that it has the sole discretion to supply it to any <br /> territory outside the city until it is needed by people within the city limits. Therefore, the Board <br /> believes a standing ordinance allowing sale of water outside the city to be contingent on an <br /> agreement that such an area annex into the city when that becomes feasible flies against the face <br /> of the City Charter, <br /> One longtime observer of the Water Board says he does not recall the City Council ever refusing <br /> to pass an ordinance requested by the Board. Thus, it appears the current City Council has <br /> opened up a new set of circumstances which should be reviewed by a court. <br />