My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) Disclosures of The CWCB, Case No. 02CW38
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) Disclosures of The CWCB, Case No. 02CW38
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:02 AM
Creation date
5/21/2010 2:32:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Gunnison RICD
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
6/24/2003
Author
Ken Salazar, Susan Schneider
Title
C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) Disclosures of The CWCB, Case No. 02CW38
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> feet. Out of the approximately 11.4 maf of water on average that originates in the <br /> Colorado River Basin in Colorado, between 2.2 and 2.4 maf is consumptively used by <br /> Colorado annually and approximately 9.2 maf on average flows out of the state either <br /> • <br /> for use in downstream states or for re- regulation at Lake Powell. <br /> D.. Fourth, the amount of water available for consumptive use in Colorado is also <br /> affected by unresolved legal interpretations of the "Law of the River." For example, <br /> whether of not surplus Colorado River System water exists and accordingly whether <br /> the Upper Basin has a liability for one -half of the Mexican Treaty delivery obligation <br /> every year. <br /> 4.4 Water Availability and Consumptive Use Investigations <br /> In 1995, the Colorado Water Conservation Board authorized a study of how much <br /> water was remaining for development in Colorado, in order to help determine how <br /> much water to appropriate for instream flows for the purpose of recovering Colorado <br /> River endangered fish. I was one of the principal investigators and authors of that <br /> study.. <br /> Recognizing many of the factors discussed above, the styidy made a number of <br /> conclusions regarding Colorado's entitlement under the "Law of the River." The study <br /> estimated that on a long -term average basis, Colorado's consumptive use entitlement is <br /> between 3.079 and 3.855 maf/yr. The actual amount available could be less or more in <br /> any ten -year period, depending upon hydrology and the determination of unresolved <br /> legal questions. The study calculated an "adjusted maximum consumptive use" in <br /> Colorado of 2.6 maf/yr based on existing uses, leaving approximately 450,000 af/yr, <br /> and potentially up to 1.227 maflyr, available for new development on an average annual <br /> basis. The study notes that there were a sufficient number of conditional water rights in <br /> existence at that time to more than fully develop Colorado's remaining Compact <br /> entitlement. I.1`oever, many of these conditional rights compete for the same water <br /> source or seek water from sources were significant new development will be difficult <br /> such as in the San Juan. Therefore, it is difficult to determine which rights will <br /> ultimately develop. In order to be conservative, we assumed some additional <br /> development would occur based on new water rights junior to a potential CWCB <br /> instream flow appropriation. The study recommended a "carve -out" or "development <br /> allowance" in each basin adequate to assure the flexibility of the state to continue <br /> developing Colorado's Compact entitlements. The study concluded that the state could <br /> make certain instream flow appropriations without impairing Colorado's ability to <br /> develop its Compact entitlement. For the Gunnison River Basin, this proposed instream <br /> flow appropriation was 1,655,888 to 1,781,873 maf/yr, or 70 -75% of the estimated <br /> average annual undepleted and unregulated flow of the Gunnison River at its confluence <br /> with the Colorado River. As an aside, gaged flow represents a regulated and depleted <br /> flow brought about by the activities of man. The Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> after considerable discussion over a couple of years elected not to appropriate these <br /> instream flows and withdrew applications that had been filed on the 15 -mile reach of <br /> the Colorado and on the lower reach of the Yampa River. <br /> The volume of water passing at the Gunnison River near Gunnison, Colorado gage <br /> • <br /> l0 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.