My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Wayne N. Aspinall Unit: Briefing on Reservoir Operations
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Wayne N. Aspinall Unit: Briefing on Reservoir Operations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:33 AM
Creation date
5/21/2010 10:37:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Gunnison River
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
1/1/2000
Author
US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation
Title
Wayne N. Aspinall Unit: Briefing on Reservoir Operations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
state, local, and private organizations three times a year to gather input for the annual operation <br />plan. This coordination has been successful in educating participants about each other's resource <br />needs and Unit purposes. <br />The Aspinall Unit allows water to be stored during spring runoff and released when needed to <br />meet downstream needs and produce hydropower. The hydrograph on the following page shows <br />how Unit operation has influenced average monthly streamflows downstream, compared to flows <br />that occurred before the Unit existed (pre - Aspinall; 1911 - 1965). Unit regulation since 1969 has <br />reduced Gunnison River flows during spring runoff and increased flows during the non - runoff <br />months. Comparing the graph line for the most recent period (1992 -1999) to the other two <br />periods shows that coordination of operations has had the effect of returning the shape of the <br />hydrograph for this short period to mimic more natural, seasonal flow patterns represented by the <br />pre - Aspinall hydrograph line. The 1966 -68 years were not included as this was when Blue Mesa <br />was filling. <br />Even with regulation, however, flows vary significantly depending on the amount of snowfall. <br />For example, annual flows through the National Park averaged 396 cfs during 1977 and 2,943 cfs <br />during 1984. Long -term changes in climatic conditions explain some of the post- versus pre - <br />Aspinall differences (overall, the 1969 -1991 period appears drier than the other two periods), but <br />changes in the seasonal distribution of flows depicted by the hydrographs are due mostly to <br />reservoir release patterns. <br />Endangered Fish <br />The Gunnison River provides habitat for two endangered fish species, the Colorado pikeminnow <br />and the razorback sucker. The 50 miles of river downstream from Delta, Colorado, are <br />designated as critical habitat for these species. These and two additional endangered fish <br />species —the humpback chub and bonytail chub—occur in the Colorado River downstream from <br />the mouth of the Gunnison River. Operation of the Unit is important in determining the flow <br />pattern of the Gunnison River, and to a lesser extent, the Colorado River. <br />Between 1990 and 1997, a major consideration in coordinating operation of the reservoirs was to <br />provide flows to support scientific research studies on the habitat and life history of these fishes <br />in the Gunnison and Colorado rivers. These studies are part of the Recovery Implementation <br />Program for Endangered Fish of the Upper Colorado River Basin (RIP), a cooperative effort of <br />private, state, and federal interests. Data from a number of individual scientific studies are now <br />being compiled into a synthesis /flow recommendation report that is scheduled for completion in <br />late 2002. These studies include inventories of native and non - native fish populations; <br />monitoring endangered fish recruitment; inventories of backwater habitats; characterizations of <br />the relationships between flows and changes in channel morphology, habitat availability, and <br />habitat maintenance; and monitoring of endangered fish stocking efforts. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.