Laserfiche WebLink
1) It is the least costly alternative with respect to capital and O&M. <br />2) The construction of a water treatment plant for Alternative No. 2 causes a greater <br />environmental and social impact, relative to the components of Alternative No. 1. <br />3) Based on the conditions with the District's distribution system, Alternative No. 2 <br />will primarily only supply the northern portion of the system with warm water from <br />the Canterbury Tunnel. In comparison, Alternative No. 2 will allow the warm <br />water from the Canterbury Tunnel to be evenly distributed throughout the system, <br />which will more effectively minimize freezing problems. <br />_J W. W. Wha�sler and Associotas, Inc 5/19/2010 Final <br />�1 Wotar Resources Enginesrs Page 18 <br />